Cited by 37Water Resource Management and QualityGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsChild Nutrition and Water Access

Time savings from easy access to clean water: Implications for rural men’s and women’s well-being

Arku, Frank S.·2010·Progress in Development Studies

Abstract

Individuals may have different perceptions of how development interventions meet their well-being. Using the Volta Rural Water Supply project in Ghana as a case study, it was found that women and men were able to save considerable amount of time by having easy access to clean water through the project, and also uses of time saved corresponded to their well-being indicators. Women, more than men, spent their saved time on activities that provide common benefits to the entire household. It is recommended that a balance of economic opportunities for both men and women, fee breaks and in-kind purchase of water, be encouraged in order for water projects to effectively advance rural people’s well-being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/146499340901000303

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When women lacked control over income and assets, they had limited decision-making power over improving or accessing water sources; constrained finances limited women's access to preferred water sources, desired water quantity, and water treatment methods.

    “When women lacked control over income and assets, they had limited decision-making power over improving or accessing water sources [65,76,86,118,123,194,199,201,258,292].Constrained finances limited women's access to preferred water sources, [64,86,111,158,170,194,[197][198][199] desired water quantity, [86,192] and water treatment methods [86,111,118,204,293].”
  • Water and sanitation improvements have freed up time for other income-generating activities; conversely, women's income generation has been constrained by poor water access, limited employment opportunities, or by WASH initiatives themselves.

    “Finally, water and sanitation improvements have freed up time for other income-generating activities [56,67,105,174,194,210,295].Conversely, women's income generation has been constrained by poor water access, limited employment opportunities, or by WASH initiatives themselves.”
  • Research in Ghana showed how a water project resulted in time savings, which further benefited well-being among women.

    “Research in Ghana showed how a water project resulted in time savings, which further benefited well-being among women [194].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arku, F. S.
Affiliations
Presbyterian University, Ghana (GH)
Corresponding author
Arku, Frank S.
Venue
Progress in Development Studies
Published
2010-06-10
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
233-246
ISSN
  • 1464-9934 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-027X
OpenAlex
W2052646332
Cited by
37
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Development Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
International Development Research Centre
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
clean water access, time savings, gender differences, women's time use, household welfare, rural water supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review