The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more?
Open accessAbstract
This article explores the research implications of using multi-methods within a broad qualitative approach by drawing on the experience of conducting two childhood obesity-focused qualitative studies of Australian children’s perceptions and experiences of place, space and physical activity. Children described and depicted their physical activities and experiences: in focus group interviews, by mapping their local, social and recreational spaces and by photographing their meaningful places, spaces and activities using a Photovoice approach. The authors describe, reflect on and critique their chosen research approach, discussing the value, utility and pitfalls associated with using multiple methods with children. The article concludes that using multiple methods in researching children’s experiences is a valuable approach that does not merely duplicate data but also offers complementary insights and understandings that may be difficult to access through reliance on a single method of data collection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants
Kitzinger, J. (1994) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023 · Cited by 3,870
Barter, C., & Renold, E. (2000) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645570050178594 · Cited by 543 · cited 1×
“…involvement’ agenda challenges researchers to consider ways of actively and meaningfully involving children in all aspects of the research process (Barter and Renold, 2000; Curtis et al., 2004; Devine, 2002; Lightfoot and Sloper, 2002; Mulvihill et al., 2000; Shemmings, 2000; Sloper and…”
BackgroundA critical appraisal of the draw and write technique
Backett-Milburn, K. (1999) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/14.3.387 · Cited by 234
Cited by
research with children: methodological issues and innovative techniques
Fargas-Malet, M., McSherry, D., Larkin, E., & Robinson, C. (2010) · Journal of Early Childhood Research · doi:10.1177/1476718x09345412 · Cited by 520
Mannay, D. (2010) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794109348684 · Cited by 386
On the Relation between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture
Rose, G. (2014) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.12109 · Cited by 379
Photovoice as a Method for Revealing Community Perceptions of the Built and Social Environment
Nykiforuk, C. I. J., Vallianatos, H., & Nieuwendyk, L. M. (2011) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940691101000201 · Cited by 342
Lundy, L., McEvoy, L., & Byrne, B. (2011) · Early Education & Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2011.596463 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Darbyshire, P., MacDougall, C., & Schiller, W.
- Venue
- Qualitative Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 417-436
- ISSN
- 1468-7941 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3109
- OpenAlex
- W2163958274
- Cited by
- 763
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1468794105056921
- The paper
- Darbyshire, P., MacDougall, C., & Schiller, W. (2005). Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more? Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056921
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.