Cited by 177Circadian rhythm and melatoninBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationImpact of Light on Environment and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A framework for predicting the non-visual effects of daylight – Part I: photobiology- based model

Open access
Andersen, M, Mardaljevic, J, Lockley, SW·2012·Lighting Research & Technology

Abstract

This paper investigates the formulation of a modelling framework for the non-visual effects of daylight, such as entrainment of the circadian system and maintenance of alertness. The body of empirical data from photobiology studies is now sufficient to start developing preliminary non-visual lighting evaluation methods for lighting design. Eventually, these non-visual effects have the potential to become a relevant quantity to consider when assessing the overall daylighting performance of a space. This paper describes the assumptions and general approach that were developed to propose a modeling framework for occupant exposure to non-visual effects of light, and presents a novel means of visualising the ‘circadian potential’ of a point in space. The proposed approach uses current outcomes of photobiology research to define – at this point static – threshold values for illumination in terms of spectrum, intensity and timing of light at the human eye. These values are then translated into goals for lighting simulation, based on vertical illuminance at the eye, that – ultimately – could become goals for building design. A new climate-based simulation model has been developed to apply these concepts to a residential environment. This will be described in Part 2 of this paper.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1477153511435961

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Heschong L, 2002, ASHRAE Journal, 44, 65
  2. Veitch J, 2004, Ocular Lighting Effects on Human Physiology and Behaviour
  3. Arsenault H, 2011, Effects of glazing colour types on daylight quality, arousal and switch-on patterns for electric lights in a scaled office room: Proceedings of the Glass Performance Days Conference 2011
  4. Gall D, Bieske K. Definition and measurement of circadian radiometric quantities: Proceedings of the 2004 CIE Symposium on Light and Health: Non Visual Effects, Vienna, Austria, September 30–2 October: 2004: 129–132.
  5. Lockley SW, 2006, Sleep, 29, 161
  6. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage, 2006, Colorimetry - Part 2: CIE Standard Illuminants
  7. Wienold J. Dynamic daylight glare evaluation: Proceedings of the International IBPSA Conference, Glasgow, UK, July 27–30: 2009: 944–951.
  8. 10.1152/ajpendo.00385.2003 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Andersen, M., Mardaljevic, J., & Lockley, S.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • De Montfort University (GB)
  • Division of Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Corresponding author
Andersen, M
Venue
Lighting Research & Technology
Published
2012-02-13
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
37-53
ISSN
  • 0024-3426 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-1535
  • 1477-0938
OpenAlex
W2103289434
Cited by
177
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lighting Research & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Keywords
circadian entrainment, alertness, photobiology, lighting simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review