Cited by 1,705Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

Stability, precision, and near-24-hour period of the human circadian pacemaker

Czeisler, Charles A., Duffy, Jeanne F., Shanahan, Theresa L., Brown, Emery N., Mitchell, Jude F., Rimmer, David W., Ronda, Joseph M., Silva, Edward J. +4 more·1999·Science

Abstract

Regulation of circadian period in humans was thought to differ from that of other species, with the period of the activity rhythm reported to range from 13 to 65 hours (median 25.2 hours) and the period of the body temperature rhythm reported to average 25 hours in adulthood, and to shorten with age. However, those observations were based on studies of humans exposed to light levels sufficient to confound circadian period estimation. Precise estimation of the periods of the endogenous circadian rhythms of melatonin, core body temperature, and cortisol in healthy young and older individuals living in carefully controlled lighting conditions has now revealed that the intrinsic period of the human circadian pacemaker averages 24.18 hours in both age groups, with a tight distribution consistent with other species. These findings have important implications for understanding the pathophysiology of disrupted sleep in older people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.284.5423.2177

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Healthy adults show interindividual differences in the free-running circadian period (tau), which shows robust stability within individuals.

    “Healthy adults show interindividual differences in the free-running circadian period (tau),94–98 which shows robust stability within individuals.97”

    From Circadian rhythms, sleep deprivation, and human performance (2013) · cites this paper as [94]

  • Circadian variation in physiological functions can be experimentally observed in constant routine or forced desynchrony laboratory protocols, which are the two gold standard methods for assessing circadian rhythmicity in humans.

    “Circadian variation in these physiological functions can be experimentally observed in either “constant routine” or “forced desynchrony” laboratory protocols, which are the two gold standard methods for assessing circadian rhythmicity in humans.”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [45]

  • In humans, food timing in constant routine protocols does not appear to affect central circadian rhythms.

    “In humans, food timing in these protocols does not appear to affect central circadian rhythms ( 18), but the effects on peripheral oscillators, for instance in adipose tissue or the liver, are unknown.”

    From Role of the circadian system in cardiovascular disease (2018) · cites this paper as [18]

  • Circulating cortisol and core body temperature increase during the last part of the night to prepare the metabolic and circulatory systems for abrupt increases in energy expenditure and activity soon after awakening.

    “For example, circulating cortisol and core body temperature increase during the last part of the night to prepare the metabolic and circulatory systems for abrupt increases in energy expenditure and activity soon after awakening (18).”

    From Role of the circadian system in cardiovascular disease (2018) · cites this paper as [18]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Czeisler, C. A., Duffy, J. F., Shanahan, T. L., Brown, E. N., Mitchell, J. F., Rimmer, D. W., Ronda, J. M., Silva, E. J., Allan, J. S., Emens, J. S., Dijk, D.-J., & Kronauer, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Czeisler, Charles A.
Venue
Science
Published
1999-06-25
Volume
284
Issue
5423
Pages
2177-2181
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2104605616
Cited by
1,705
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 87
FWCI
17.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG009975, P01 AG-09975)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM53559, R01GM053559)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR002635, MO1 RR 02635)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
circadian period, melatonin rhythm, cortisol rhythm, aging, endogenous rhythms
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Biological Clocks, Body Temperature, Circadian Rhythm, Darkness, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Light, Male, Melatonin, Middle Aged, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review