Cited by 264Asthma and respiratory diseasesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Biofeedback treatment for asthma.

Lehrer, Paul M., Vaschillo, Evgeny, Vaschillo, Bronya, Lu, Shou-En, Scardella, Anthony, Siddique, Mahmood, Habib, Robert H.·2004·Chest

Abstract

Study objectives We evaluated the effectiveness of heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback as a complementary treatment for asthma. Patients Ninety-four adult outpatient paid volunteers with asthma. Setting The psychophysiology laboratory at The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, and the private outpatient offices of participating asthma physicians. Interventions The interventions were as follows: (1) a full protocol (ie, HRV biofeedback and abdominal breathing through pursed lips and prolonged exhalation); (2) HRV biofeedback alone; (3) placebo EEG biofeedback; and (4) a waiting list control. Design Subjects were first prestabilized using controller medication and then were randomly assigned to experimental groups. Medication was titrated biweekly by blinded asthma specialists according to a protocol based on National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines, according to symptoms, spirometry, and home peak flows. Measurements Subjects recorded daily asthma symptoms and twice-daily peak expiratory flows. Spirometry was performed before and after each weekly treatment session under the HRV and placebo biofeedback conditions, and at triweekly assessment sessions under the waiting list condition. Oscillation resistance was measured approximately triweekly. Results Compared with the two control groups, subjects in both of the two HRV biofeedback groups were prescribed less medication, with minimal differences between the two active treatments. Improvements averaged one full level of asthma severity. Measures from forced oscillation pneumography similarly showed improvement in pulmonary function. A placebo effect influenced an improvement in asthma symptoms, but not in pulmonary function. Groups did not differ in the occurrence of severe asthma flares. Conclusions The results suggest that HRV biofeedback may prove to be a useful adjunct to asthma treatment and may help to reduce dependence on steroid medications. Further evaluation of this method is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.126.2.352

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biofeedback approaches aiming to mimic heightened cardiorespiratory synchronization achieved during 0.1 Hz breathing have proven effective in disorders as diverse as asthma, PTSD, and depression.

    “These approaches, aiming to mimic the heightened cardiorespiratory synchronization achieved during 0.1 Hz breathing and ranging from wearable sensors and patches to mobile phone applications, have proven effective in disorders as diverse as asthma, PTSD, and depression (Lehrer et al., 2004; Karavidas et al., 2007; Zucker et al., 2009).”
  • Learning to voluntarily increase HF-HRV through biofeedback has beneficial effects for diverse medical and psychopathological conditions such as asthma, cardiovascular disease, depression, and PTSD.

    “Learning to voluntarily increase HF-HRV through biofeedback also has beneficial effects for diverse medical and psychopathological conditions such as asthma31,32, cardiovascular disease33, depression34, and PTSD35.”
  • The ability to increase HF-HRV through slower breathing has been linked to symptom reduction in a variety of bodily and mental disorders, such as cardiovascular and pulmonary disease, as well as depression and PTSD, making these findings clinically relevant.

    “The ability to increase HF-HRV through slower breathing has been linked to symptom reduction in a variety of bodily and mental disorders, such as cardiovascular33 and pulmonary disease31,32, as well as depression34 and PTSD35, making these findings clinically relevant.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehrer, P. M., Vaschillo, E., Vaschillo, B., Lu, S.-E., Scardella, A., Siddique, M., & Habib, R. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
  • Mercy Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Lehrer, Paul M.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
126
Issue
2
Pages
352-361
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149624545
Cited by
264
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL58805, R01HL058805)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
asthma, heart rate variability biofeedback, complementary therapy, pursed-lip breathing, steroid dependence, lung function, peak expiratory flow
MeSH terms
Adult, Asthma, Biofeedback, Psychology, Electroencephalography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Spirometry, Models, Statistical, Baroreflex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review