CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 325Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effectiveness of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Programs: A Review of Psychological, Medical, Legal, and Community Outcomes

Campbell, Rebecca, Patterson, Debra, Lichty, Lauren F.·2005·Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
DOI 10.1177/1524838005280328
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs, specially trained forensic nurses provide 24-hour-a-day, first-response medical care and crisis intervention to rape survivors in either hospitals or clinic settings. This article reviews the empirical literature regarding the effectiveness of SANE programs in five domains:(a) promoting the psychological recovery of survivors, (b) providing comprehensive and consistent postrape medical care (e.g., emergency contraception, sexually transmitted disease [STD] prophylaxis), (c) documenting the forensic evidence of the crime completely and accurately, (d) improving the prosecution of sexual assault cases by providing better forensics and expert testimony, and (e) creating community change by bringing multiple service providers together to provide comprehensive care to rape survivors. Preliminary evidence suggests that SANE programs are effective in all domains, but such conclusions are tentative because most published studies have not included adequate methodological controls to rigorously test the effectiveness of SANE programs. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1524838005280328

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Aiken, M. M., 1995, Journal of Emergency Nursing, 2, 466
  2. Antognoli-Toland, P., 1985, Journal of Emergency Nursing, 11, 132
  3. Arndt, S., 1988, California Nurse, 84, 4
  4. Cornell, D., 1998, New Jersey Medicine, 2, 45
  5. Crandall, C., 2003, Impact evaluation of a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program
  6. Hutson, L. A., 2002, Emergency Nursing, 37, 79
  7. Lang, K., 1999, Sexual assault nurse examiner resource guide for Michigan communities
  8. Ledray, L. E., 1992, Journal of Emergency Nursing, 18, 217
  9. Ledray, L. E., 1996, Minnesota Medicine, 79, 43
  10. Ledray, L. E., 1999, Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) development and operations guide
  11. Ledray, L. E., 1994, Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 32, 7
  12. 10.1016/S0099-1767(98)90081-2 · DOI
  13. Lenehan, G., 1991, Journal of Emergency Nursing, 17, 1
  14. Littel, K., 2001, Office for Victims of Crime Bulletin, 4, 1
  15. Malloy, M. (1991). Relationship of nurse identified therapeutic techniques to client satisfaction reports in a crisis program . Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
  16. Martin, P. Y., 1994, Law and Social Inquiry, 19, 853
  17. Mouradian, V. E., 2001, Recommendations for establishing and maintaining successful researcher-practitioner collaborations
  18. Rovi, S., 2002, Journal of American Medical Women’s Association, 57, 204
  19. Seneski, P., 1992, The American College of Physician Executives, 417
  20. Solola, A., 1983, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 61, 373
  21. Uttley, L., 2000, Prochoice Ideas, 3
  22. Williams, J. E., 1984, Victimology: An International Journal, 9, 66

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–325 of 325

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, R., Patterson, D., & Lichty, L. F.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2005-10
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
313-329
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
DOI
10.1177/1524838005280328
OpenAlex
W2165798400
Cited by
324
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
18.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
sexual assault nurse examiners, rape victims, forensic nursing, emergency contraception, expert testimony, psychological recovery, community-based care, program effectiveness
MeSH terms
Counseling, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Forensic Medicine, Humans, Male, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Diagnosis, Nursing Service, Hospital, Rape, United States, Program Evaluation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Crime Victims, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review