Cited by 700Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGun Ownership and Violence Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intimate Partner Homicide: Review and Implications of Research and Policy

Abstract

Current rates of intimate partner homicide of females are approximately 4 to 5 times the rate for male victims, although the rates for both have decreased during the past 25 years. The major risk factor for intimate partner homicide, no matter if a female or male partner is killed, is prior domestic violence. This review presents and critiques the evidence supporting the other major risk factors for intimate partner homicide in general, and for intimate partner homicide of women (femicide) in particular, namely guns, estrangement, stepchild in the home, forced sex, threats to kill, and nonfatal strangulation (choking). The demographic risk factors are also examined and the related phenomena of pregnancy-related homicide, attempted femicide, and intimate partner homicide-suicide.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1524838007303505

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Bailey, J.E., 1997, Internal Medicine, 157, 777
  2. Berk, R.A., Berk, S., Loseke, D.R. & Rauma, D. (1983). Mutual combat and other family violence myths . In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 197-212). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  3. Block, C.R., 2000, The Chicago Women's Health Study: Risk of serious injury or death in intimate violence: A collaborative research project
  4. Brewer, V.E., 1999, Studies, 3, 317
  5. Brock, K., 2003, When men murder women: An analysis of 2001 homicide data
  6. Campbell, J.C., 1981, Science, 3, 67
  7. Campbell, J.C., 1986, Science, 8, 36
  8. Campbell, J.C., 2005, Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment Validation Study: The RAVE Study
  9. Campbell, J.C., 1999, Violence Against Women, 5, 1017
  10. Campbell, J.C., Soeken, K., McFarlane, J. & Parker, B. (1998). Risk factors for femicide among pregnant and nonpregnant battered women. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Empowering survivors of abuse: Health care for battered women and their children (pp. 90-97). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Campbell, J.C., Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  12. Campbell, J.C., 2003, National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 14
  13. Daly, M., 1997, Studies, 1, 61
  14. Dawson, R., 1998, Studies, 2, 378
  15. De Becker, G., 2000, Domestic violence method (DV MOSAIC)
  16. Dugan, L., 1999, Studies, 3, 187
  17. Dugan, L., 2003, National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 20
  18. Fagan, J., Stewart, D.E. & Hansen, K. (1983). Violent men or violent husbands? Background factors and situational correlates. In R. J. Gelles , G. Hotaling, M. A. Straus, & D. Finkelhor (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 49-68). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  19. Fox, J.A., 2005, Uniform crime reports [United States]: Supplementary homicide reports, 1976-2002 [Computer file]
  20. Fox, J.A., 2004, Homicide trends in the US
  21. Gelles, R., Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Children Exposed to Family Violence
  22. Greenfeld, L.A., 1998, Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, or girlfriends
  23. Grisso, J.A., 1991, Epidemiology, 134, 59
  24. Hall-Smith, P., 1998, Studies, 2, 400
  25. Jaynes, G.D., 1989, A common destiny: Blacks and
  26. Klein, E., 1997, Ending domestic violence: Changing public perceptions
  27. Langford, L., 1998, Studies, 2, 353
  28. McFarlane, J., 1999, Studies, 3, 300
  29. Moracco, K.E., 1998, Studies, 2, 422
  30. Pataki, G., 1998, Intimate partner homicides in New York State
  31. Renzetti, C.M., 2001, Homicide Studies, 1, 72
  32. Sharps, P.W., 2003, National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 8
  33. Smith, P.H., 1998, Studies, 2, 400
  34. Webster, D.W., 2007, Victims' reports of criminal justice system actions to remove firearms from abusive intimate partners: An exploratory study
  35. Wilbur, L., 2001, Emergency Medicine, 21, 297
  36. Wilt, S.A., 1995, Female homicide victims in New York City
  37. Zawitz, M.W., 1994, Violence between intimates

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 700

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, J. C., Glass, N., Sharps, P. W., Laughon, K., & Bloom, T.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Published
2007-07
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
246-269
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
OpenAlex
W2048195841
Cited by
698
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 20
FWCI
15.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Keywords
intimate partner homicide, femicide, domestic violence, risk factors, firearms, estrangement, stepchildren, forced sex, gender differences in homicide
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Homicide, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Prevention, Sex Offenses, Sexual Partners, Social Responsibility, Social Values, Socioeconomic Factors, Spouse Abuse, United States, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review