Cited by 99Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and Neglect

Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Intimate Relationships: A Scoping Review

Open access
Rogers, Michaela M., Fisher, Colleen, Ali, Parveen, Allmark, Peter, Fontes, Lisa·2023·Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Abstract

Technology-facilitated abuse (TFA) is a significant, harmful phenomenon and emerging trend in intimate partner violence. TFA encompasses a range of behaviours and is facilitated in online spaces (on social media and networking platforms) and through the misuse of everyday technology (e.g. mobile phone misuse, surveillance apps, spyware, surveillance via video cameras and so on). The body of work on TFA in intimate relationships is emerging, and so this scoping review set out to establish what types of abuse, impacts and forms of resistance are reported in current studies. The scoping review examined studies between 2000 and 2020 that focused on TFA within intimate partnerships (adults aged 18+) within the setting of any of these countries: the UK and Ireland, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus were searched in December 2020. A total of 22 studies were included in the review. The main findings were that TFA is diverse in its presentation and tactics, but can be typed according to the eight domains of the Duluth Power & Control Wheel. Impacts are not routinely reported across studies but broadly fall into the categories of social, mental health and financial impacts and omnipresence. Similarly, modes of resistance are infrequently reported in studies. In the few studies that described victim/survivor resistance, this was in the context of direct action, access to legal or professional support or in the identification of barriers to resistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15248380221090218

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, M. M., Fisher, C., Ali, P., Allmark, P., & Fontes, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Michaela M.
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Published
2022-05-10
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
2210-2226
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
OpenAlex
W4280551988
Cited by
99
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7
FWCI
19.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
World Universities Network
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
technology-facilitated abuse, intimate partner violence, online abuse, surveillance technology, spyware, social media, power and control, victim resistance, survivor support, mental health outcomes
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adult, Australia, Humans, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review