Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Intimate Relationships: A Scoping Review
Open accessAbstract
Technology-facilitated abuse (TFA) is a significant, harmful phenomenon and emerging trend in intimate partner violence. TFA encompasses a range of behaviours and is facilitated in online spaces (on social media and networking platforms) and through the misuse of everyday technology (e.g. mobile phone misuse, surveillance apps, spyware, surveillance via video cameras and so on). The body of work on TFA in intimate relationships is emerging, and so this scoping review set out to establish what types of abuse, impacts and forms of resistance are reported in current studies. The scoping review examined studies between 2000 and 2020 that focused on TFA within intimate partnerships (adults aged 18+) within the setting of any of these countries: the UK and Ireland, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus were searched in December 2020. A total of 22 studies were included in the review. The main findings were that TFA is diverse in its presentation and tactics, but can be typed according to the eight domains of the Duluth Power & Control Wheel. Impacts are not routinely reported across studies but broadly fall into the categories of social, mental health and financial impacts and omnipresence. Similarly, modes of resistance are infrequently reported in studies. In the few studies that described victim/survivor resistance, this was in the context of direct action, access to legal or professional support or in the identification of barriers to resistance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., et al. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-0850 · Cited by 43,565 · see citing works
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x · Cited by 11,385 · see citing works
A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency
Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. A. (2014) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1123 · Cited by 3,078 · see citing works
Coercive Control: The Entrapment Of Women In Personal Life
Stark, E. (2007) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195154276.001.0001 · Cited by 1,502 · see citing works
Education Groups for Men Who Batter
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993) · doi:10.1891/9780826179913 · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Digital harassment and abuse: Experiences of sexuality and gender minority adults
Powell, A., Scott, A. J., & Henry, N. (2020) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370818788006 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Image-Based Sexual Abuse: Online Distribution Channels and Illicit Communities of Support
Henry, N., & Flynn, A. (2019) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801219863881 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Sexting coercion as a component of intimate partner polyvictimization
Ross, J. M., Drouin, M., & Coupe, A. (2019) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260516660300 · Cited by 97 · cited 3× · see citing works
“A similar conclusion is drawn from a survey of undergraduate students (n=885, constituted by 584 women and 301 men) of sexting and in-person sexual coercion, which showed that sexting independently contributed to psychological, emotional and sexual problems in women (Ross et al., 2019).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review
Henry, N., & Beard, G. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241266137 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Kassing, K., & Collins, A. (2026) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605251320998 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Pater, J., McDaniel, B. T., Nova, F. F., Drouin, M., O'Connor, K., & Zytko, D. (2025) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.13152 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rogers, M. M., Fisher, C., Ali, P., Allmark, P., & Fontes, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rogers, Michaela M.
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-05-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2210-2226
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- PMC
- PMC10486147
- OpenAlex
- W4280551988
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 19.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- World Universities Network
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Keywords
- technology-facilitated abuse, intimate partner violence, online abuse, surveillance technology, spyware, social media, power and control, victim resistance, survivor support, mental health outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Intimate Partner Violence, Adult, Australia, Humans, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review