Cited by 14Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse and Trauma

Subtle or Covert Abuse Within Intimate Partner Relationships: A Scoping Review

Open access
Parkinson, Rosemary, Jong, Stephanie T., Hanson, Sarah·2024·Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global health problem enacted with varying degrees of severity, leading to mental and physical damage. Despite the acknowledgment that perpetration can be enacted in a subtle or covert way, there is a paucity of literature defining and describing such subtle abuse. Consequently, understanding about the behaviors and impacts of subtle abuse is limited, and there is a potential inability by therapists to recognize it in their clients. This scoping review sought to identify and synthesize the literature around subtle or covert abuse (SCA) in intimate adult relationships to clarify the concept, with the aim to aid professional recognition. PsychINFO (EBSCO), MEDLINE Complete (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsychArticles (EBSCO), Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and EThOS were searched using relevant search terms. In total, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria by containing a description or definition of abuse based on primary research with adults in intimate partner relationships. Findings were synthesized using descriptive content analysis under four headings: (a) Descriptions and groupings of SCA behaviors, (b) The impact of SCA on victims, (c) Underlying theories of SCA, and (d) Recognition by professionals. This review suggests that SCA may be the most damaging of all abuses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15248380241268643

Cites

59 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Burnett K. A. (2020). Covert psychological abuse and the process of breaking free: A transformative mixed-methods study on female survivors of male partners [Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology]. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Issue February). https://search.proquest.com/docview/2418752474?accountid=9673%0Ahttp://bc-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/openurl/BCL/services_page?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=ProQ:ProQuest+Dissertat
  2. García-Moreno C. Jansen H. A. F. M. Ellsberg M. Heiser L. Watts C. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women, unpublished sub-analysis. http://www.who.int/gender/violence/who_multicountry_study/en/ 17027732
  3. Hightower E. (2018). An exploratory study of personality factors related to psychological abuse and gaslighting. [William James College]. In Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering (Vol. 79, Issues 8-B(E)). http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc14&NEWS=N&AN=2018-26097-157
  4. Hurst C. (2015). Non-physical abuse of women within intimate heterosexual relationships. In Gubi P. M. (Ed.), Listening to less-heard voices: Developing counsellor’s awareness (pp. 118– 155). University of Chester Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2015-18572-004&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  5. McKibbin C. L. (1998). The relationship of subtle and overt psychological abuse to women’s self-concept and psychological symptoms [ProQuest Information & Learning]. In Dissertation abstracts international: Section B: The sciences and engineering (Vol. 58, Issues 7-B). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1998-95002-128&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=eds-live&scope=site
  6. Miller J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology for women. Beacon Press.
  7. Romero J. M. P. Manso J. M. M. Alonso M. B. Sánchez M. E. G.-B. (2013). Socialized/subclinical psychopaths in intimate partner relationships: Profile, psychological abuse and risk factors. Papeles Del Psicólogo, 34(1), 32– 48.
  8. Stark E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parkinson, R., Jong, S. T., & Hanson, S.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Parkinson, Rosemary
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Published
2024-10-09
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
4090-4101
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
OpenAlex
W4403302199
Cited by
14
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
intimate partner violence, intimate relationships, abuse perpetration, victim impact
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Sexual Partners, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review