Cited by 8Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Study on Machine Learning Models in Detecting Cognitive Impairments in Alzheimer’s Patients Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers

Open access
Tiwari, Vivek K., Indic, Premananda, Tabassum, Shawana·2024·American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®

Abstract

Several research studies have demonstrated the potential use of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers such as amyloid beta 1-42, T-tau, and P-tau, in early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease stages. The levels of these biomarkers in conjunction with the dementia rating scores are used to empirically differentiate the dementia patients from normal controls. In this work, we evaluated the performance of standard machine learning classifiers using cerebrospinal fluid biomarker levels as the features to differentiate dementia patients from normal controls. We employed various types of machine learning models, that includes Discriminant, Logistic Regression, Tree, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, and Naïve Bayes classifiers. The results demonstrate that these models can distinguish cognitively impaired subjects from normal controls with an accuracy ranging from 64% to 69% and an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics between 0.64 and 0.73. In addition, we found that the levels of 2 biomarkers, amyloid beta 1-42 and T-tau, provide a modest improvement in accuracy when distinguishing dementia patients from healthy controls.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15333175241308645

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Performance metrices of the best performance model using two biomarker levels. (A) Reciever operating charateristics and (B) Confusion matrix along with TPR and FNR values.
Figure 1. Performance metrices of the best performance model using two biomarker levels. (A) Reciever operating charateristics and (B) Confusion matrix along with TPR and FNR values.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68542-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00530-1 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/dad2.12314 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70355-6 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70139-5 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1192/bjp.140.6.566 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1212/WNL.43.11.2412-a · DOI · Paper page
  9. Khan TK, 2016, Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease
  10. 10.1097/01.JGP.0000192478.82189.a8 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/braincomms/fcad027 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.3390/jpm12050815 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2712 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.069 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s12276-019-0250-2 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Tiwari VK, 2024, Machine learning classification of Alzheimer’s disease stages using cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers alone
  18. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00070-3 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1001/jama.2024.13855 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Tiwari, V. K., Indic, P., & Tabassum, S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Tyler (US)
Corresponding author
Tabassum, Shawana
Venue
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®
Published
2024-01
Volume
39
Pages
15333175241308645-15333175241308645
ISSN
  • 0888-4897 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-3175
  • 1938-2731
OpenAlex
W4405220950
Cited by
8
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, amyloid-beta 42, tau protein, phosphorylated tau, cognitive impairment detection, early diagnosis, machine learning classifiers, classification accuracy
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Early Diagnosis, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review