The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expatriate Preparation: A Critical Analysis of 25 Years of Cross-Cultural Training Research
Open accessAbstract
Although much research in the 1960s and 1970s was devoted to cross-cultural issues such as expatriate employment, researchers moved away from doing cross-cultural research in order to direct their efforts toward the hot topics of the time. However, the past few decades have seen an exponential increase in the globalization of our economy, and this ever-increasing globalization has made the need for cross-cultural research salient once again. In the past decade alone, there has been an explosion of research examining the components and effectiveness of cross-cultural training (CCT) for expatriate preparation. Thus, the ultimate purpose of this literature review is to present the past 25 years of CCT research relevant to expatriate preparation by examining the following: the need for CCT research, the deficiencies in past research, typical training components, training delivery, theory pertaining to CCT, potential moderators of the relationship between CCT and expatriate performance, the effectiveness of CCT in enhancing expatriate performance, suggestions for future research, and strategies for improving CCT implementation and research. After reviewing the past 25 years of CCT research, it is evident that CCT is effective in facilitating success on expatriate assignments. However, additional empirical research is needed on moderators, expatriate selection, training program supplements, theoretical frameworks, methodological challenges, and the customization of CCT to assignment objectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harrison, J. K. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.6.952 · Cited by 145
Cited by
Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and Society
Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505 · Cited by 1,453
Leung, K., Ang, S., & Tan, M. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091229 · Cited by 450
A validation study of the Cross‐Cultural Adaptability Inventory
Nguyen, N. T., Biderman, M. D., & McNary, L. D. (2010) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2010.00345.x · Cited by 25
Intercultural training: six measures assessing training needs
Graf, A., & Mertesacker, M. (2009) · Journal of European Industrial Training · doi:10.1108/03090590910974419 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Littrell, L. N., Salas, E., Hess, K. P., Paley, M., & Riedel, S.
- Venue
- Human Resource Development Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 355-388
- ISSN
- 1534-4843 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6712
- OpenAlex
- W1965346509
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expatriate Preparation: A Critical Analysis of 25 Years of Cross-Cultural Training Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1534484306290106
- The paper
- Littrell, L. N., Salas, E., Hess, K. P., Paley, M., & Riedel, S. (2006). Expatriate Preparation: A Critical Analysis of 25 Years of Cross-Cultural Training Research. Human Resource Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484306290106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.