Cited by 9Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Online Cognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder in Adolescence: A Clinical Case Study Using the CT@TeenSAD

Open access
Ganho-Ávila, Ana, Vieira Figueiredo, Diana, Vagos, Paula·2022·Clinical Case Studies

Abstract

SAD is an intense fear or anxiety associated with past, current, or future social situations. The Clark and Wells (1995) cognitive model for SAD has been proved to be clinically effective in adults, and its developmentally sensitive adaptations for adolescents have recently shown promising results. Given this evidence and considering that adolescence is typically the age of onset for the first SAD symptoms and a critical developmental period for the delivery of evidence-based interventions, we adapted CT for adolescents for online intervention (CT@TeenSAD) encompassing 10 weekly, 90 min sessions, extended by two booster sessions. This work presents the first case study of that intervention as applied to Merida (M.; pseudonym; 17-year-old, girl). The estimated Reliable Change Index shows M.’s progress for most of her symptoms, from pre-to post-treatment (RCI-1 range: −.53 to −8.03), and the maintenance of benefits at 3 months follow-up (RCI-2 range: .00 to −2.25). A relapse in the adoption of safety behaviors was seen between post-treatment and follow-up, which might be explained by the life-changing challenges experienced by M. between session 10 and follow-up, concerning her transition from high school to college. M.’s case study offers a first glance on the promising results of CT@TeenSAD related to its efficacy and feasibility. Likewise, it offers the opportunity to critically appraise the limitations of the intervention as well as practical challenges and suggestions thought to be useful for therapists willing to implement CT@TeenSAD in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15346501221091519

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive therapy was found to be effective in adult SAD as well as promising in adolescent SAD, whether delivered in person or remotely.

    “Cognitive therapy was found to be effective in adult SAD [70] as well as promising in adolescent SAD, whether when delivered in person [71,72] or remotely [73].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ganho-Ávila, A., Vieira Figueiredo, D., & Vagos, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention–CINEICC, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • Universidade Portucalense (PT)
Corresponding author
Ganho-Ávila, Ana
Venue
Clinical Case Studies
Published
2022-05-18
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
533-551
ISSN
  • 1534-6501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3802
OpenAlex
W4280586753
Cited by
9
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Clinical Case Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/PSI-ESP/29445/2017)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, adolescents, safety behavior, maintenance therapy, transition to college, intervention feasibility, reliable change index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review