Cited by 22Human-Animal Interaction StudiesCancer survivorship and careArt Therapy and Mental Health

Animal-Assisted Therapy and Counseling Support for Women With Breast Cancer: An Exploration of Patient’s Perceptions

Open access
White, Jennifer H., Quinn, Martina, Garland, Sheila, Dirkse, Dale, Wiebe, Patricia, Hermann, Madeline, Carlson, Linda E.·2015·Integrative Cancer Therapies

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animal-assisted therapy (AAT) interventions have been shown to assist in coping and improve patient responses to symptoms. Specifically, the presence of an animal has been found to lower anxiety and motivate participation in therapy. We aimed to explore the acceptability of and experience of AAT during individual breast cancer counseling sessions. METHODS: Patients undertaking counseling with a therapy dog present were invited to participate in the study. Patients were individually interviewed and asked to reflect on their experiences of AAT. Data generation and analysis were concurrent. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using a process of constant comparison. RESULTS: Our sample included 8 female participants, 39 to 61 years old, at an average of 3 years post-breast cancer diagnosis. The majority of patients reported a positive experience with AAT. Themes that emerged around their counseling experience included benefits in the process of initiating counseling and benefits for greater engagement and personal disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating AAT into the delivery of counseling for breast cancer patients appears to be feasible and acceptable at a patient level. From a clinical perspective, AAT promoted increased communication with health professionals. This is of clinical importance as a means to improve participation and engagement in therapy-important elements in therapeutic outcomes. However, further evaluation of the impact of AAT on specific patient outcomes and psychological morbidity is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1534735415580678

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, J. H., Quinn, M., Garland, S., Dirkse, D., Wiebe, P., Hermann, M., & Carlson, L. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Regina (CA)
Venue
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Published
2015-04-20
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
460-467
ISSN
  • 1534-7354 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-695X
OpenAlex
W2055361357
Cited by
22
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Integrative Cancer Therapies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Calgary
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
animal-assisted therapy, therapy dogs, breast cancer, cancer counseling, patient experience, acceptability, patient engagement, disclosure, anxiety, coping, patient-professional communication
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Combined Modality Therapy, Counseling, Dogs, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Animal Assisted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review