Cited by 415Human-Animal Interaction StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsArt Therapy and Mental Health

The effects of animal-assisted therapy on anxiety ratings of hospitalized psychiatric patients

Barker, Sandra B., Dawson, Kathryn S.·1998·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Animal-assisted therapy involves interaction between patients and a trained animal, along with its human owner or handler, with the aim of facilitating patients' progress toward therapeutic goals. This study examined whether a session of animal-assisted therapy reduced the anxiety levels of hospitalized psychiatric patients and whether any differences in reductions in anxiety were associated with patients' diagnoses. METHODS: Study subjects were 230 patients referred for therapeutic recreation sessions. A pre- and posttreatment crossover study design was used to compare the effects of a single animal-assisted therapy session with those of a single regularly scheduled therapeutic recreation session. Before and after participating in the two types of sessions, subjects completed the state scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, a self-report measure of anxiety currently felt. A mixed-models repeated-measures analysis was used to test differences in scores from before and after the two types of sessions. RESULTS: Statistically significant reductions in anxiety scores were found after the animal-assisted therapy session for patients with psychotic disorders, mood disorders, and other disorders, and after the therapeutic recreation session for patients with mood disorders. No statistically significant differences in reduction of anxiety were found between the two types of sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Animal-assisted therapy was associated with reduced state anxiety levels for hospitalized patients with a variety of psychiatric diagnoses, while a routine therapeutic recreation session was associated with reduced levels only for patients with mood disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ps.49.6.797

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barker, S. B., & Dawson, K. S.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
1998-06
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
797-801
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2131464998
Cited by
415
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
animal-assisted therapy, anxiety, psychiatric inpatients, therapeutic recreation, state anxiety, mood disorders, psychosis, human-animal interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Anxiety Disorders, Human-Animal Bond, Dogs, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Care Team, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy, Group, Psychotic Disorders, Recreation, Cross-Over Studies, Mood Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review