Cited by 231Phytoestrogen effects and researchEstrogen and related hormone effectsPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Phytoestrogens induce differential estrogen receptor alpha- or Beta-mediated responses in transfected breast cancer cells

Harris, D. M., Besselink, E., Henning, S. M., Go, V. L. W., Heber, D.·2005·Experimental Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Increased intake of phytoestrogens may be associated with a lower risk of cancer in the breast and several other sites, although there is controversy surrounding this activity. One of the mechanisms proposed to explain the activity of phytoestrogens is their ability to bind and activate human estrogen receptor a (ERα) and human estrogen receptor β (ERβ). Nine phytoestrogens were tested for their ability to transactivate ERα or ERβ at a range of doses. Mammary adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cells were co-transfected with either ERα or ERβ, and an estrogen-response element was linked to a luciferase reporter gene. Dose-dependent responses were compared with the endogenous ligand 17β-estradiol. Purified genistein, daidzein, apigenin, and coumestrol showed differential and robust transactivation of ERα- and ERβ-induced transcription, with an up to 100-fold stronger activation of ERβ. Equol, naringenin, and kaempferol were weaker agonists. When activity was evaluated against a background of 0.5 nM 17β-estradiol, the addition of genistein, daidzein, and resveratrol superstimulated the system, while kaempferol and quercetin were antagonists at the highest doses. This transfection assay provides an excellent model to evaluate the activation of ERα and ERβ by different phytoestrogens in a breast cancer context and can be used as a screening bioassay tool to evaluate the estrogenic activity of extracts of herbs and foods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/153537020523000807

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, D. M., Besselink, E., Henning, S. M., Go, V. L. W., & Heber, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Harris, D. M.
Venue
Experimental Biology and Medicine
Published
2005-09
Volume
230
Issue
8
Pages
558-568
ISSN
  • 0071-3384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3702
  • 1535-3699
OpenAlex
W1797116645
Cited by
231
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (P50AT000151, AT00151)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
phytoestrogens, estrogen receptor alpha, estrogen receptor beta, breast cancer, MCF-7 cells, genistein, daidzein, resveratrol, coumestrol, apigenin, kaempferol, quercetin, naringenin, equol, estrogenic activity, estrogen response element, estradiol, luciferase reporter assay, bioassay screening
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Breast Neoplasms, Estradiol, Female, Humans, Plasmids, Recombinant Proteins, Transfection, Transcriptional Activation, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Point Mutation, Cell Line, Tumor, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Estrogen Receptor beta, Phytoestrogens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review