CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 161Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorSocial Power and Status DynamicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trust and Leader—Member Exchange: A Closer Look at Relational Vulnerability

Scandura, Terri A., Pellegrini, Ekin K.·2008·Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
DOI 10.1177/1548051808320986
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Trust in work relationships is an intriguing topic in leader—member exchange (LMX) research, however, previous LMX studies examined trust as unidimensional. Research on LMX has yet to explore the multidimensional nature of trust and how different dimensions may affect LMX quality. This study with 228 full-time employees explores the effect of different trust dimensions on LMX relationships. It is interesting that LMX quality was positively related to identification-based trust as well as calculus-based trust, which involves calculative exchanges. Results found support for a nonlinear association between calculus-based trust and LMX. Thus, contrary to expectations, trust appears to be vulnerable even in high-quality LMX relations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1548051808320986

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Brower, H.H., 2008, Journal of Management
  2. Dulebohn, J.H., 2008, A meta-analysis of the antecedents of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future [Working paper]
  3. Graen, G.B. (1976). Role-making process within complex organizations . In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201-1245). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  4. Graen, G.B. & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143-166). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
  5. Lewicki, R.J., 1997, The three components of interpersonal trust: Instrument development and differences across relationships
  6. 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Mitchell, M.S., Presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management
  8. Uhl-Bien, M., Panelist, the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology meetings
  9. Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G.B. & Scandura, T.A. (2000). Implications of leader-member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 18, pp. 137-185). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  10. 10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00023-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Scandura, T. A., & Pellegrini, E. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2008-06-30
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
101-110
ISSN
  • 1548-0518 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-7089
DOI
10.1177/1548051808320986
OpenAlex
W2156560813
Cited by
160
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
leader-member exchange, trust, multidimensional trust, identification-based trust, LMX quality, nonlinear relationship, employee-employer relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review