Cited by 97Leadership and Management in OrganizationsEmployee Performance and LeadershipEmployee Performance and Management

The relation between servant leadership, organizational performance, and the high-performance organization framework

de Waal, André, Sivro, Mirna·2012·Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

Abstract

Many authors on servant leadership (SL) claim that there exists a direct positive relationship between SL and organizational performance, but empirical evidence for this has thus far been lacking. There are indications, however, that introducing SL in an organization has a positive influence on mediating factors of performance, which in turn lead to better organizational performance. There is empirical evidence that applying the high-performance organization (HPO) framework does lead to increased organizational performance. As SL deals with behaviors and attitudes of managers, it is a reasonable assumption that SL has a certain influence on management quality, one of the factors of high performance included in the HPO framework. In this respect, one or more HPO factors might be mediating factors between SL and organizational performance. This article evaluates empirically the relation between SL, organizational performance, and the HPO framework. A theoretical proposition of these relations was made and, based on a sample of 116 managers and employees of Vrije Universiteit medical center, the levels of SL, HPO, and performance in Vrije Universiteit medical center were measured. This case study showed no evidence of a direct positive relation between SL and organizational performance. There was evidence of SL having an influence on the factors in the HPO framework but this influence was different on various organizational levels. It was concluded that the role of SL in the cas…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1548051812439892

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Limited mixed-method published research on servant leadership typically pairs an organizational survey with follow-up interviews to understand why the phenomena occurred.

    “The limited mixed-method published research on servant leadership typically pairs an organizational survey with follow up interviews to have a greater understanding of why the phenomena has occurred (e.g.Beck, 2014;de Waal & Sivro, 2012;Holt & Marques, 2012).”

    From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as de Waal & Sivro, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Waal, A., & Sivro, M.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht School of Management, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
173-190
ISSN
  • 1548-0518 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-7089
OpenAlex
W1980027679
Cited by
97
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
servant leadership, organizational performance, management quality, mediators, healthcare organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review