Cited by 501

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings

Endsley, Mica R.·2015·Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

Abstract

Situation awareness (SA) has become a widely used construct within the human factors community, the focus of considerable research over the past 25 years. This research has been used to drive the development of advanced information displays, the design of automated systems, information fusion algorithms, and new training approaches for improving SA in individuals and teams. In recent years, a number of papers criticized the Endsley model of SA on various grounds. I review those criticisms here and show them to be based on misunderstandings of the model. I also review several new models of SA, including situated SA, distributed SA, and sensemaking, in light of this discussion and show how they compare to existing models of SA in individuals and teams.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1555343415572631

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 111

  1. 10.1518/001872095779049462 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/154193129904300318 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/154193120004400150 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/154193120204600105 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/154193120705101203 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/154193120204600354 · DOI
  7. Cannon-Bowers J. A., 1993, Current issues in individual and group decision making, 221
  8. 10.1207/s15327108ijap0601_2 · DOI
  9. Carmody M. A., 1993, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology
  10. 10.1146/annurev.an.12.100183.002241 · DOI
  11. Chiappe D. L., 2012, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, iFirst, 1
  12. 10.1080/1463922X.2011.611267 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/10447318.2012.634768 · DOI
  14. Chidester T. R., 1990, Personality factors in flight operations: Volume I. Leadership characteristics and crew performance in a full-mission air transport simulation
  15. 10.1207/s15327108ijap0603_1 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/154193120705100415 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.179 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/1071181311551075 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10111-003-0136-9 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/14639220903010092 · DOI
  22. Dekker S., 2004, A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory, measurement and application
  23. 10.1518/001872006779166316 · DOI
  24. Durso F. T., 1999, Handbook of applied cognition, 284
  25. 10.1177/154193128803200221 · DOI
  26. Endsley M. R., 1989, Tactical simulation 3 test report: Addendum 1 situation awareness evaluations
  27. Endsley M. R., 1990, A methodology for the objective measurement of situation awareness Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations
  28. Endsley M. R., 1993, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology
  29. 10.1207/s15327108ijap0302_5 · DOI
  30. 10.1518/001872095779049543 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Endsley M. R., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 163
  32. Endsley M. R., 1999, Human factors in aviation systems, 257
  33. 10.1177/154193120004400117 · DOI
  34. 10.1201/b12461 · DOI
  35. Endsley M. R., 2004, A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory, measurement and application, 317
  36. 10.1017/CBO9780511816796.036 · DOI
  37. 10.1207/s15327108ijap0403_3 · DOI
  38. 10.1201/9780203485088 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Endsley M. R., 1998, Situation awareness information requirements for commercial airline pilots
  40. 10.1109/DASC.1998.741572 · DOI
  41. Endsley M. R., 2012, Designing for situation awareness: An approach to human-centered design
  42. Endsley M. R., 2001, New trends in cooperative activities: Understanding system dynamics in complex environments, 46
  43. 10.1518/001872095779064555 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1177/154193129604002107 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00073-6 · DOI
  46. 10.1201/b12461 · DOI
  47. 10.1177/154193129403800113 · DOI
  48. 10.2514/atcq.6.1.21 · DOI
  49. 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1518/001872095779049480 · DOI
  51. 10.1080/14639220903009961 · DOI
  52. 10.1177/155534340700100103 · DOI
  53. 10.1177/154193120504900313 · DOI
  54. Gugerty L. J., 2000, Situation awareness analysis and measurement, 249
  55. 10.1177/1555343412451749 · DOI
  56. Horswill M. S., 2004, A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory, measurement and application, 155
  57. Jones D. G., 1996, Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 67, 507
  58. Jones D. G., 2002, Measurement of shared SA in teams: In initial investigation
  59. 10.1177/154193120304700372 · DOI
  60. 10.2514/6.2009-6790 · DOI
  61. Jones W. M., 1997, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology
  62. 10.1177/107118139704100147 · DOI
  63. 10.1002/prs.680160304 · DOI
  64. 10.1080/1463922021000054335 · DOI
  65. 10.1177/001872089606380204 · DOI
  66. Klein G. A., 1993, Decision making in action: Models and methods, 138
  67. 10.1109/MIS.2006.100 · DOI
  68. 10.1109/MIS.2006.75 · DOI
  69. Klein G. A., 2007, Expertise out of context: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making, 113
  70. 10.1518/001872005775570970 · DOI
  71. 10.1207/s15327876mp1603_1 · DOI
  72. 10.1177/154193120504900340 · DOI
  73. Mosier K. L., 1991, Designing for everyone, 798
  74. National Transportation Safety Board, 1984, Aircraft Accidents Report, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., L-1011, Miami, Florida, May 5, 1983
  75. 10.1080/00140130701276640 · DOI
  76. Orasanu J., 1990, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
  77. Orasanu J., 1995, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Eigth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology
  78. Orasanu J., 1993, Decision making in action: Models and methods, 327
  79. 10.1518/155534308X284417 · DOI
  80. 10.1080/14639220903009946 · DOI
  81. Prince C., 1993, Cockpit resource management, 337
  82. Prince C., 1998, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 1, 315
  83. Prince C., 1995, Experimental analysis and measurement of situation awareness
  84. 10.1177/154193120805200410 · DOI
  85. 10.21236/ADA159080 · DOI
  86. 10.1518/001872095779049525 · DOI
  87. 10.1080/14639220701561775 · DOI
  88. 10.1080/1463922X.2010.539289 · DOI
  89. 10.1080/14639220903009953 · DOI
  90. 10.1518/001872008X312233 · DOI
  91. 10.1207/s15327108ijap0101_4 · DOI
  92. 10.1518/001872095779049516 · DOI
  93. Scielzo S., 2009, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd Annual Meeting
  94. 10.1518/001872095779049444 · DOI
  95. 10.1518/hfes.46.3.461.50392 · DOI
  96. 10.1080/1463922X.2010.491874 · DOI
  97. 10.1080/14639220903009870 · DOI
  98. 10.1080/14639220903009938 · DOI
  99. 10.1080/00140130600612762 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1007/PL00011496 · DOI
  101. Stout R. J., 1996, Training Research Journal, 2, 85
  102. 10.1080/10508414.2011.556492 · DOI
  103. Taylor R. M., 1996, Applied aviation psychology: Achievement, change and challenge, 447
  104. 10.1177/1557234X0600200102 · DOI
  105. Uhlarik J., 2002, A review of situation awareness literature relevant to pilot surveillance functions
  106. Weick K. E., 1995, Sensemaking in organizations
  107. Weick K. E., 1999, Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 81
  108. Wickens C. D., 1992, Insight: The Visual Performance Technical Group Newsletter, 14, 1
  109. 10.1518/001872008X288420 · DOI
  110. 10.1080/00140136908931083 · DOI
  111. 10.1080/14639220903010027 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 501

Metadata

Authors
Endsley, M. R.
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Published
2015-02-24
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
4-32
ISSN
1555-3434
Cited by
501
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review