The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Price Setting in the NBA Gambling Market: Tests of the Levitt Model of Sportsbook Behavior
Abstract
Levitt (2004) suggested that sportsbooks do not set prices in the NFL to clear markets, as was commonly assumed, but set prices to maximize profits. This paper uses actual betting data from four sportsbooks to test the Levitt (2004) hypothesis in the NBA. For a sample of the 2004-05 to 2006-07 seasons, it is shown that favorites receive a disproportionate share of NBA pointspread bets. In addition, the percentage of bets the favorite receives increases with each additional point of the pointspread. In the totals market, it is shown that overs receive a much higher percentage of bets compared to unders and the percentage bet on the over increases with each point of the total. Unlike the NFL, however, taking a contrarian position and betting against public sentiment is not found to win more often than implied by efficiency.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Why are Gambling Markets Organised so Differently from Financial Markets?
Levitt, S. D. (2004) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00207.x · Cited by 377
Prices of State Contingent Claims with Insider Traders, and the Favourite-Longshot Bias
Shin, H. S. (1992) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234526 · Cited by 182
Optimal Betting Odds Against Insider Traders
Shin, H. S. (1991) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234434 · Cited by 166 · cited 2×
“Unlike Shin (1991, 1992), however, Levitt suggested biased pointspreads in the NFL betting market reflect a sportsbook’s confidence that its forecasts are superior to those implied by the betting aggregate.”
Beating the Spread: Testing the Efficiency of the Gambling Market for National Football League Games
Zuber, R. A., Gandar, J. M., & Bowers, B. D. (1985) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261332 · Cited by 144
Sauer, R. D. O., Brajer, V., Ferris, S. P., & Marr, M. W. (1988) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261532 · Cited by 112
Market Efficiency and Football Betting
Pankoff, L. D. (1968) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/295077 · Cited by 83 · cited 1×
“This model differs substantially from the traditional models of sportsbook behavior, such as Pankoff (1968), Bassett (1981), Zuber et al. (1985), Sauer et al. (1988), and summarized in Sauer (1998), where pointspreads are set by sportsbooks to balance the betting dollars between favorites and…”
DOES SPORTSBOOK.COM SET POINTSPREADS TO MAXIMIZE PROFITS?
Paul, R. J., & Weinbach, A. P. (2012) · The Journal of Prediction Markets · doi:10.5750/jpm.v1i3.429 · Cited by 68
Self-citationMarket Efficiency and a Profitable Betting Rule
Paul, R. J., & Weinbach, A. P. (2002) · Journal of Sports Economics · doi:10.1177/1527002502003003003 · Cited by 66
Self-citationTesting efficiency in gambling markets
Even, W. E., & Noble, N. R. (1992) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036849200000106 · Cited by 49
Efficient markets, fair bets, and profitability in NBA totals 1995–96 to 2001–02
Paul, R. J., Weinbach, A. P., & Wilson, M. (2003) · The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance · doi:10.1016/s1062-9769(03)00033-4 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- ManterisA., & TalleyR. (1991).Superbookie. Chicago IL. Contemporary Books, Inc.
- PaulR., WeinbachA., & MaharJ. (2007). The betting market response to the 2-point conversion in the NFL. Journal of Business and Economic Perspectives,33(1), 98–109.
- RoxboroughM., & RhodenM. (1998).Race and sports book management. Las Vegas, NV: Las Vegas Sports Consultants.
- SauerR. (1998) The economics of wagering markets.Journal of Economic Literature,36(4), 2021–2064.
Cited by
Andrikogiannopoulou, A., & Papakonstantinou, F. (2019) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz127 · Cited by 74
Exploiting sports-betting market using machine learning
Hubáček, O., Šourek, G., & Železný, F. (2019) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.01.001 · Cited by 67
SENTIMENT BIAS AND ASSET PRICES: EVIDENCE FROM SPORTS BETTING MARKETS AND SOCIAL MEDIA
Feddersen, A., Humphreys, B. R., & Soebbing, B. P. (2016) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12404 · Cited by 56
Consumption benefits and gambling: Evidence from the NCAA basketball betting market
Humphreys, B. R., Paul, R. J., & Weinbach, A. P. (2013) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.010 · Cited by 49
Self-citationNa, S., Su, Y., & Kunkel, T. (2018) · European Sport Management Quarterly · doi:10.1080/16184742.2018.1530689 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Paul, R. J., & Weinbach, A. P.
- Affiliations
- St. Bonaventure University (US)
- Coastal Carolina University (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Sport Finance
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 137-145
- ISSN
- 1558-6235 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-076X
- OpenAlex
- W1599717521
- Semantic Scholar
- 4f0fc2e2a6c2897a3854cbd5ac56177b286ec42a
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Sport Finance (publishedVersion)
- International Journal of Sport Finance (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Keywords
- sports betting, NBA, implied probabilities, market efficiency, public sentiment, profit maximization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Price Setting in the NBA Gambling Market: Tests of the Levitt Model of Sportsbook Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/155862350800300302
- The paper
- Paul, R. J., & Weinbach, A. P. (2008). Price Setting in the NBA Gambling Market: Tests of the Levitt Model of Sportsbook Behavior. International Journal of Sport Finance. https://doi.org/10.1177/155862350800300302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.