Cited by 182Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesSports Analytics and PerformanceEconomic theories and models

Prices of State Contingent Claims with Insider Traders, and the Favourite-Longshot Bias

Shin, Hyun Song·1992·The Economic Journal

Abstract

Hyun Song Shin; Prices of State Contingent Claims with Insider Traders, and the Favourite-Longshot Bias, The Economic Journal, Volume 102, Issue 411, 1 March 19

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2234526

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, H. S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Shin, Hyun Song
Venue
The Economic Journal
Published
1992-03
Volume
102
Issue
411
Pages
426
ISSN
0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023017267
Cited by
182
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
Keywords
state-contingent claims, insider trading, favorite-longshot bias, betting markets, market efficiency, information asymmetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review