Cited by 22Behavioral Health and InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorMedia Influence and Health

Intervention engagement moderates the dose-response relationships in a dietary intervention

Open access
Lippke, Sonia, Corbet, Jana M., Lange, Daniela, Parschau, Linda, Schwarzer, Ralf·2016·Dose-Response

Abstract

Behavioral interventions could lead to changes in behavior through changes in a mediator. This dose–response relationship might only hold true for those participants who are actively engaged in interventions. This Internet study investigated the role of engagement in a planning intervention to promote fruit and vegetable consumption in addition to testing the intervention effect on planning and behavior. A sample of 701 adults (mean = 38.71 years, 81% women) were randomly assigned either to a planning intervention (experimental group) or to one of 2 control conditions (untreated waiting list control group or placebo active control group). Moderated mediation analyses were carried out. Significant changes over time and time × group effects revealed the effectiveness of the intervention. The effect of the intervention (time 1) on changes in behavior (time 3; 1 month after the personal deadline study participants set for themselves to start implementing their plans) was mediated by changes in planning (time 2; 1 week the personal deadline). Effects of planning on behavior were documented only at a moderate level of intervention engagement. This indicates an inverse U-shaped dose–response effect. Thus, examining participants’ intervention engagement allows for a more careful evaluation of why some interventions work and others do not.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1559325816637515

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DBCIs have the potential to generate datasets sufficiently large to reliably model and experimentally test mediation of outcomes by engagement with particular intervention components and to statistically control for confounding moderator effects such as baseline motivation levels.

    “DBCIs have the potential to generate datasets sufficiently large to be able to reliably model and experimentally test 34 mediation of outcomes by engagement with particular intervention components and to statistically control for confounding moderator effects such as baseline motivation levels.22,26,35,36”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Michie SF Wood CE Health behavior change techniques In: Norman P Conner M, eds. Predicting and Changing Health Behavior. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press; 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lippke, S., Corbet, J. M., Lange, D., Parschau, L., & Schwarzer, R.
Affiliations
  • Constructor University (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
Corresponding author
Lippke, Sonia
Venue
Dose-Response
Published
2016-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1559325816637515-1559325816637515
ISSN
1559-3258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2311054114
Cited by
22
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dose-Response (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
intervention engagement, dose-response relationship, intervention planning, fruit and vegetable intake, dietary behavior change, behavioral interventions, moderated mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review