The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing
Open accessAbstract
Qualitative researchers face unique opportunities and challenges as a result of the disruption of COVID-19. Although the pandemic represents a unique opportunity to study the crisis itself, social distancing mandates are restricting traditional face-to-face investigations of all kinds. In this article, we describe options and resources for researchers who find themselves needing to alter their study designs from face-to-face qualitative data collection to a “socially distant” method. Although technologies are constantly changing, we review the latest videoconferencing services available to researchers and provide guidance on what services might best suit a project’s needs. We describe options for various platforms and applications including information about enhanced security applications for researchers collecting sensitive patient health information. Concerns about these technologies including security of the platform and logistical needs such as computer equipment are also discussed. Special attention is given to ethical issues when transitioning research efforts to online venues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919874596 · Cited by 2,164 · cited 1×
“Zoom is a videoconferencing platform that has already been extensively used for research purposes (Archibald et al., 2019; Daniels et al., 2019; Kite & Phongsavan, 2017; Lobe, 2017; Matthews et al., 2018).”
MethodSkype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers
Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794113488126 · Cited by 856
Virtual Methods : Issues in Social Research on the Internet
(2005) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781474215930 · Cited by 654
Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews
Lo Iacono, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. H. K. (2016) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.5153/sro.3952 · Cited by 589
The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods
Fielding, N. G., Lee, R. M., & Blank, G. (2017) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781473957992 · Cited by 434
Methods in the Time of COVID-19: The Vital Role of Qualitative Inquiries
Teti, M., Schatz, E., & Liebenberg, L. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920920962 · Cited by 341
Drabble, L., Trocki, K. F., Salcedo, B., Walker, P. C., & Korcha, R. A. (2016) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/1473325015585613 · Cited by 322
Johnson, D. R., Scheitle, C. P., & Ecklund, E. H. (2021) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439319893612 · Cited by 245
Lessons Learned Using Web Conference Technology for Online Focus Group Interviews
Tuttas, C. A. (2015) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732314549602 · Cited by 219
Data Collection via In-Depth Email Interviewing: Lessons From the Field
Fritz, R., & Vandermause, R. K. (2017) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732316689067 · Cited by 200
Cited by
Subedi, K. R. (2025) · KMC Journal · doi:10.3126/kmcj.v7i1.75109 · Cited by 16
“To capture their stories, I conducted a narrative interview with each of them as literature (Engward et al., 2022; Ham et al., 2022; Keen et al., 2022; Lobe et al., 2020; Rice, 2023), allowing data collection from a distance virtually.”
Mutual support between patients and family caregivers in palliative care: A qualitative study
McCauley, R., Ryan, K., McQuillan, R., & Foley, G. (2023) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163231205130 · Cited by 13
Santarossa, S., Redding, A., & Murphy, D. (2023) · American Journal of Qualitative Research · doi:10.29333/ajqr/13016 · Cited by 8
Lev, S., Waksman, Y., & Schindler, M. (2024) · Journal of Gerontological Social Work · doi:10.1080/01634372.2024.2339986 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Qualitative Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-01-01
- Volume
- 19
- ISSN
- 1609-4069 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3041935342
- Cited by
- 819
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 186.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1609406920937875
- The paper
- Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.