The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Challenge to Opportunity: Virtual Qualitative Research During COVID-19 and Beyond
Open accessAbstract
COVID-19 has required researchers to adapt methodologies for remote data collection. While virtual interviewing has traditionally received limited attention in the qualitative literature, recent adaptations to the pandemic have prompted increased discussion and adoption. Yet, current discussion has focussed on practical and ethical concerns and retained a tone of compromise, of coping in a crisis. This paper extends the nascent conversations begun prior to the pandemic to consider the wider methodological implications of video-call interviews. Beyond the short-term, practical challenges of the pandemic, these adaptations demonstrate scope for longer-term, beneficial digitalisation of both traditional and emergent interview methods. Updating traditional interview methods digitally has demonstrated how conversion to video interviewing proves beneficial in its own right. Virtual focus-group-based research during COVID-19, for example, accessed marginalised populations and elicited notable rapport and rich data, uniting people in synchronous conversation across many environments. Moreover, emergent interview methods such as the Grid Elaboration Method (a specialised free-associative method) demonstrated further digitalised enhancements, including effective online recruitment with flexible scheduling, virtual interactions with significant rapport, and valuable recording and transcription functions. This paper looks beyond the pandemic to future research contexts where such forms of virtual interviewing may confer unique advantages: supporting researcher and participant populations with mobility challenges; enhancing international research where researcher presence or travel may be problematic. When opportunities for traditional face-to-face methods return, the opportunity for virtual innovation should not be overlooked.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
Lewis, S. (2015) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839915580941 · Cited by 22,105
Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data
Brooks, F. B., Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1996) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329757 · Cited by 11,180
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919874596 · Cited by 2,164 · cited 1×
“…has drawn particular interest (Lobe et al., 2020; Roberts et al., 2021; Teti et al., 2020), given its greater scope for emulating natural conversation (Nehls et al., 2015) and establishing rapport above other virtual approaches (Archibald et al., 2019; Deakin & Wake fi eld, 2013; Sy et al., 2020).”
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
(2000) · Quine · doi:10.1163/9789004457751_016 · Cited by 1,080
Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers
Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794113488126 · Cited by 856
Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing
Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920937875 · Cited by 819
Beyond 'Do No Harm': The Challenge of Constructing Ethical Relationships in Refugee Research
Mackenzie, C., McDowell, C., & Pittaway, E. (2007) · Journal of Refugee Studies · doi:10.1093/jrs/fem008 · Cited by 642
Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research
Janghorban, R., Roudsari, R. L., & Taghipour, A. (2014) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being · doi:10.3402/qhw.v9.24152 · Cited by 560
Williams, S. N., Armitage, C. J., Tampe, T., & Dienes, K. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039334 · Cited by 537
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-2986 · Cited by 501
Cited by
Subedi, K. R. (2025) · KMC Journal · doi:10.3126/kmcj.v7i1.75109 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Keen, S., Lomeli-Rodriguez, M., & Joffe, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Qualitative Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 16094069221105075-16094069221105075
- ISSN
- 1609-4069 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4282917573
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 73.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Challenge to Opportunity: Virtual Qualitative Research During COVID-19 and Beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/16094069221105075
- The paper
- Keen, S., Lomeli-Rodriguez, M., & Joffe, H. (2022). From Challenge to Opportunity: Virtual Qualitative Research During COVID-19 and Beyond. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221105075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.