Cited by 74Diabetes Management and EducationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareObesity and Health Practices

Barriers and facilitators to self-care communication during medical appointments in the United States for adults with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Ritholz, Marilyn D, Beverly, Elizabeth A, Brooks, Kelly M, Abrahamson, Martin J, Weinger, Katie·2014·Chronic Illness

Abstract

Objective: Diabetes self-care is challenging and requires effective patient–provider communication to achieve optimal treatment outcomes. This study explored perceptions of barriers and facilitators to diabetes self-care communication during medical appointments. Design: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews with a semistructured interview guide. Participants: Thirty-four patients with type 2 diabetes and 19 physicians who treat type 2 diabetes. Results: Physicians described some patients as reluctant to discuss their self-care behaviors primarily because of fear of being judged, guilt, and shame. Similarly, patients described reluctant communication resulting from fear of being judged and shame, particularly shame surrounding food intake and weight. Physicians and patients recommended trust, nonjudgmental acceptance, open/honest communication, and providing patients hope for living with diabetes as important factors for improving self-care communication. Further, patients stressed the clinical benefits of physicians directly addressing poor self-care behaviors while physicians described having few strategies to address these difficulties. Conclusions: Physician–patient self-care communication barriers included patients’ reluctance to discuss self-care behaviors and physicians’ perceptions of few options to address this reluctance. Treatment recommendations stressed the importance of establishing trusting, nonjudgmental and open patient–provider communication for optimal diabetes treatment. Medical education is needed to improve physicians’ strategies for addressing self-care communication during medical appointments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1742395314525647

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An engaging and open dialogue between HCPs and people with T1D is highly important for optimal disease management, as it promotes collaboration, communication, and people's participation in their own treatment decisions.

    “Previous studies have identified that an engaging and open dialogue between HCPs and people with T1D is highly important for optimal disease management, as it promotes collaboration, communication, and people's participation in their own treatment decisions.25,26”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritholz, M. D., Beverly, E. A., Brooks, K. M., Abrahamson, M. J., & Weinger, K.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Ohio University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
Corresponding author
Weinger, Katie
Venue
Chronic Illness
Published
2014-02-24
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
303-313
ISSN
  • 1742-3953 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9206
OpenAlex
W2158022687
Cited by
74
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chronic Illness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007260, P30DK036836)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-care, patient-provider communication, communication barriers, shame, fear of judgment, physician-patient trust, physician training, medical appointments
MeSH terms
Adult, Appointments and Schedules, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Communication Barriers, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Self Care, United States, Treatment Outcome, Trust, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review