The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science
Open accessAbstract
If science were a game, a dominant rule would probably be to collect results that are statistically significant. Several reviews of the psychological literature have shown that around 96% of papers involving the use of null hypothesis significance testing report significant outcomes for their main results but that the typical studies are insufficiently powerful for such a track record. We explain this paradox by showing that the use of several small underpowered samples often represents a more efficient research strategy (in terms of finding p < .05) than does the use of one larger (more powerful) sample. Publication bias and the most efficient strategy lead to inflated effects and high rates of false positives, especially when researchers also resorted to questionable research practices, such as adding participants after intermediate testing. We provide simulations that highlight the severity of such biases in meta-analyses. We consider 13 meta-analyses covering 281 primary studies in various fields of psychology and find indications of biases and/or an excess of significant results in seven. These results highlight the need for sufficiently powerful replications and changes in journal policies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also, the publication culture promotes novel, and often surprising, findings and this will motivate researchers to postulate improbable hypotheses (20).”
From Statistical and Methodological Considerations for the Interpretation of Intranasal Oxytocin Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“From a statistical point of view this problem might not be any more serious for this field than other domains of psychology (20, 21, 31) or neuroscience in general (14).”
From Statistical and Methodological Considerations for the Interpretation of Intranasal Oxytocin Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, one pervasive problem in the social sciences, including psychology, that threatens the accuracy of meta-analytic estimates is publication bias (Bakker et al., 2012; Franco et al., 2014, 2016)”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“Given that publication bias and researcher degrees of freedom are understood to be pervasive problems in psychological science (Bakker et al., 2012; Franco et al., 2014, 2016; Hesse, 2018; John et al., 2012), unadjusted effect sizes are likely to be overestimated (Kvarven et al., 2020).”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal
Ndiaye, M., Lespez, L., Tribolo, C., Rassé, M., Hadjas, I., Davidoux, S., Huysecom, É., & Douze, K. (2024) · Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000667478 · Cited by 24,214
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2004) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,289
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · Cited by 5,815
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 3×
“Such practices lead to inflated ESs and increased false positive rates (Ioannidis, 2005, 2008b; Simmons et al., 2011).”
BackgroundResultCohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015575 · Cited by 3,257
Belief in the law of small numbers.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031322 · Cited by 3,246
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.128 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 799
Even Simultaneous Bilinguals Do Not Reach Monolingual Levels of Proficiency in Syntax
Li, W., & Hartshorne, J. K. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7040293 · Cited by 6
Novel prediction and the problem of low-quality accommodation
Syrjänen, P. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04400-2 · Cited by 7
Runge, Y., Frings, C., Tempel, T., & Pastötter, B. (2021) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15368 · Cited by 6
Bonding and Stability of Ternary Structures in the CeT2Al20 (T=Ta, W, Re) and YRe2Al20 Alloys
Yaniv, G., Vidal, D., Fuks, D. L., & Meshi, L. (2020) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met10040422 · Cited by 6
Mirza, I., & Sheikh, A. K. P. (2020) · GEOGRAPHY ENVIRONMENT SUSTAINABILITY · doi:10.24057/2071-9388-2019-169 · Cited by 6
Cognitive function in association with high estradiol levels resulting from fertility treatment
Leeners, B., Krüger, T. H. C., Geraedts, K., Tronci, E., Mancini, T., Ille, F., Egli, M., Röblitz, S., Wunder, D. M., Saleh, L., et al. (2021) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2021.104951 · Cited by 7
Ease of articulation: A replication
Shuster, L., & Cottrill, C. (2015) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.05.004 · Cited by 6
The Limitations of Social Science as the Arbiter of Blame: An Argument for Abandoning Retribution
Tullett, A. M. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211033284 · Cited by 7
Anvari, F., Olsen, J., Yiu, H. W., & Feldman, G. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104052 · Cited by 6
Morales, Ó. O. (2014) · Pensamiento Psicológico · doi:10.11144/javerianacali.ppsi12-2.rcpi · Cited by 6
How do employees learn at work ?
Gerken, M. (2016) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20160629mg · Cited by 6
van Zyl, L. E. (2019) · SA Journal of Industrial Psychology · doi:10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1768 · Cited by 6
van den Akker, O. R., van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Vugt, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5zbja · Cited by 6
Til, K. V., Phillips, N. L., Du, T. V., Rose, L., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2025) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026251331550 · Cited by 6
Bertin, P., & Nera, K. (2025) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.979 · Cited by 6
Riesthuis, P., & Cribbie, R. A. (2025) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.21.2.p082 · Cited by 5
How to Identify and How to Conduct Research that Is Informative and Reproducible
Zickfeld, J., & Schubert, T. W. (2019) · Theory and history in the human and social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33099-6_9 · Cited by 5
Replicability in psychological research: a reflection
Leyva, S. B. C., & Domínguez-Lara, S. (2020) · Interacciones Revista de Avances en Psicología · doi:10.24016/2020.v6n3.172 · Cited by 10
Paniagua, D., Sánchez‐Iglesias, I., Miguel-Álvaro, A., Casas-Aragonez, N., García, M. E. A., & Aguayo‐Estremera, R. (2022) · Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación - e Avaliação Psicológica · doi:10.21865/ridep66.5.02 · Cited by 9
Reconsidering what makes syntheses of psychological intervention studies useful
Sakaluk, J. K., Santis, C. D., Kilshaw, R. E., Pittelkow, M.-M., Brandes, C. M., Boness, C. L., Botanov, Y., Williams, A. J., Wendt, D. C., Lorenzo‐Luaces, L., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00213-9 · Cited by 5
Götz, M., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0742-730120230000041004 · Cited by 8
Riesthuis, P., & Otgaar, H. (2024) · Journal of Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1108/jcp-04-2024-0031 · Cited by 5
Only Human: Scientists, Systems, and Suspect Statistics
Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E., & Magis‐Weinberg, L. (2014) · Opticon1826 · doi:10.5334/opt.ch · Cited by 5
A Pragmatic Approach to Statistical Testing and Estimation (PASTE)
Leppink, J. (2018) · Health Professions Education · doi:10.1016/j.hpe.2017.12.009 · Cited by 5
Crossman, M. K., & Herzog, H. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815395-6.00031-6 · Cited by 5
Botella, J., Suero, M., Durán, J. I., & Blazquez, D. (2021) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.433051 · Cited by 6
Minimal replicability, generalizability, and scientific advances in psychological science.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2013) · Cited by 5
Zenker, F. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198859307.003.0027 · Cited by 5
Big-M-Small-N Temporal-Order Judgment Data
T{"{u}}nnermann, J., & Scharlau, I. (2021) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.17.4.p355 · Cited by 5
Pot la psicologia rescatar-se a si mateixa?. Incentius, biaix i replicabilitat
Fernando, B., César, P. L. J., & Vadillo, M. A. (2018) · Anuari de Psicologia de la Societat Valenciana de Psicologia · doi:10.7203/anuari.psicologia.18.2.231 · Cited by 5
Veldkamp, C. L. S. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/g8cjq · Cited by 6
Peters, G.-J. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/38vfn · Cited by 5
Robustness of the adult statistical word segmentation literature: Part 1Preprint
Hartshorne, J. K., Skorb, L., Dietz, S. L., Garcia, C., Iozzo, G., Lamirato, K., Ledoux, J., Mu, J., Murdock, K., Ravid, J., et al. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vu8je · Cited by 5
Nilsson, A., & Sinclair, S. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/anh8v · Cited by 5
How WEIRD is CHI?Preprint
Linxen, S., Sturm, C., Brühlmann, F., Cassau, V., Opwis, K., & Reinecke, K. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xye8u · Cited by 6
Maximizing the Reproducibility of Your ResearchPreprint
Bosco, F. A., Carp, J., Field, J. G., IJzerman, H., Lewis, M., Munafo, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Prenoveau, J. M., Spies, J. R., & Giner‐Sorolla, R. (2016) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/k9mn3 · Cited by 5
Open Science is Liberating and Can Foster CreativityPreprint
Frankenhuis, W. E., & Nettle, D. (2018) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/edhym · Cited by 9
Schindler, S., Hilgard, J., Fritsche, I., Burke, B., & Pfattheicher, S. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8y6me · Cited by 5
Calderon, S., Giolla, E. M., Ask, K., Adler, S. J., Agerström, J., Akpınar, B., Albayrak‐Aydemir, N., Alparone, F. R., Amin, S., Aquino, A., et al. (2026) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459251401177 · Cited by 9
Teymoori, A., & Trappes, R. (2026) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680261421875 · Cited by 7
Correcting for publication bias in a meta-analysis with the p-uniform* method
van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2026) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02812-4 · Cited by 118
Error needs culture! Exploring the relationship between error culture and openness
Frank, M., Miller, B., Vosskuhl, J., Zänkert, S., Heßelmann, F., & Jolliffe, J. D. (2026) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.242233 · Cited by 6
Possible Solutions for a Less Politicized Social Psychological Science
Jussim, L. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2017) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315112619-15 · Cited by 4
Ethical Considerations in Psychology Research
Oates, J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_35 · Cited by 4
method to streamline p-hacking
Hussey, I. (2021) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2020.2529 · Cited by 4
Sotola, L. K., & Credé, M. (2023) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104435 · Cited by 4
Riesthuis, P., Rassin, E., Bücken, C. A., Booker, A., Chin, J. M., Goldfarb, D., Deferme, D., & Otgaar, H. (2025) · The International Journal of Evidence & Proof · doi:10.1177/13657127251357630 · Cited by 4
Risk as an Explanatory Factor for Researchers’ Inferential Interpretations
Hoekstra, R. (2015) · The Mathematics Enthusiast · doi:10.54870/1551-3440.1338 · Cited by 4
A Scalpel Not a Sword: On the Role of Statistical Tests in Design Cognition
Fuge, M. (2015) · ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE) · doi:10.1115/detc2015-46840 · Cited by 4
Pemahaman Peneliti Psikologi mengenai Besaran Sampel: Data dan Simulasi
Wiradhany, W., Adiasto, K., Yulianto, J. E., & Kiling, I. Y. (2019) · Jurnal Psikologi · doi:10.22146/jpsi.24260 · Cited by 8
Cristea, I. A., Georgescu, R., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2021) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026211049366 · Cited by 4
Crowdsourcing Global Perspectives in Ecology Using Social Media
Graham, E. B., & Smith, A. P. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.588894 · Cited by 5
Hostler, T. (2024) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2023.3764 · Cited by 4
Koenitz, H., Roth, C., & Mekler, E. D. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-18884-8 · Cited by 5
My Ban on Null Hypothesis Significance Testing and Confidence Intervals
Trafimow, D. (2018) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04263-9_3 · Cited by 4
Scholarly Merits: From Measurement to Judgment
Funke, J. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617740129 · Cited by 4
Hardwicke, T. E. (2017) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/r4c32 · Cited by 4
The Relation between Intelligence and Adaptive Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.
Alexander, R. (2017) · KU ScholarWorks (University of Kansas) · Cited by 4
Effect Size Interpretation, Sample Size Calculation, and Statistical Power in GerontologyPreprint
Brydges, C. R. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u2jbm · Cited by 5
Hurley, P. J. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3794259 · Cited by 5
The Emerging Relationship Between Clinical Psychology and the Credibility MovementPreprint
Reardon, K. W., Corker, K. S., & Tackett, J. L. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/46rk5 · Cited by 4
Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original studyPreprint
van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/g3sne · Cited by 5
Quality assessment of scientific manuscripts in peer review and educationPreprint
Augusteijn, H. E. M., Wicherts, J. M., Sijtsma, K., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/7dc6a · Cited by 4
Diagnosis and therapy of psychology by means of systematicity theoryPreprint
Witte, E. H. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/dy4kn · Cited by 4
Heterogeneity in effect size estimates: Empirical evidence and practical implicationsPreprint
Holzmeister, F., Johannesson, M., BOHM, R. M., Dreber, A., Huber, J., & Kirchler, M. (2024) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/583un · Cited by 4
Voir La Vie Sans Rose-Colored Glasses
Paap, K. R., & Majoubi, J. (2025) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000648 · Cited by 4
Dick, A. S., Comer, J. S., Bayat, M., Curtis, M., Hayes, T., Pruden, S. M., Hawes, S. W., González, R., Laird, A. R., & Graziano, P. A. (2025) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101630 · Cited by 9
The emerging submission crisis in behavioral science
Spitzer, M. (2026) · Trends in Neuroscience and Education · doi:10.1016/j.tine.2026.100276 · Cited by 5
Action and abstraction: Motor interference changes meaning in language understanding
Solana, P., Escámez, O., Vigliocco, G., Casasanto, D. J., & Santiago, J. (2026) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2026.104749 · Cited by 3
MacCoun, R. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190938550.003.0011 · Cited by 4
Ethical concerns in statistical analyses: Implications for clinical research and practice.
Gaasedelen, O. J. (2016) · Professional Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/pro0000074 · Cited by 3
Quality Vs. Quantity: Assessing Behavior Change over Time
Moskowitz, A. L., Krull, J. L., Trickey, K. A., & Chorpita, B. F. (2017) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-017-9602-1 · Cited by 3
A preliminary study of the educational benefits of conducting replications in the classroom.
Jern, A. (2018) · Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology · doi:10.1037/stl0000104 · Cited by 3
Alpha Is Not the False Alarm Rate: An Activity to Dispel a Common Statistical Misconception
Thompson, W. (2018) · Teaching of psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628318816156 · Cited by 3
The Underlying Process of Prosocial Behavior Among Soldiers: A Terror Management Theory Perspective
Heller, I., & Halabi, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.770723 · Cited by 3
Analysis of the interval between submission and publication in genetics journals
Zimmer, R. L., Mancuso, A. C. B., Matte, Ú. D. S., & Ashton‐Prolla, P. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284866 · Cited by 19
Cohen’s convention, the seriousness of errors, and the body of knowledge in behavioral science
Arslan, A., & Zenker, F. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04753-2 · Cited by 3
Müller, T. (2015) · Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit · doi:10.5553/tcc/221195072015005001007 · Cited by 3
Predicting subsequent task performance from goal motivation and goal failure
Healy, L. C., Ntoumanis, N., Stewart, B. D., & Duda, J. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00926 · Cited by 3
Cursan, A. (2018) · Pratiques Psychologiques · doi:10.1016/j.prps.2018.03.001 · Cited by 3
Greenberg, L. R., McNamara, K., & Wilkins, S. (2021) · Family Court Review · doi:10.1111/fcre.12602 · Cited by 3
Bayes factor benefits for clinical psychology: review of child and adolescent evidence base
Bertelsen, T. B., Hoffart, A., Rekdal, S. S., & Zahl‐Olsen, R. (2022) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.76842.2 · Cited by 3
van Assen, M. A. L. M., van den Akker, O. R., Augusteijn, H. E. M., Bakker, M., Nuijten, M. B., Olsson-Collentine, A., Stoevenbelt, A. H., Wicherts, J. M., & van Aert, R. C. M. (2023) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000513 · Cited by 9
ZWISCHEN TRADITION UND MODERNE
Lübke, R. (2021) · packREPORT · doi:10.51202/0342-3743-2021-1-2-045 · Cited by 3
Clerc, J., Rémy, L., & Leclercq, M. (2017) · Enfance · doi:10.4074/s001375451700204x · Cited by 4
Ferns, G. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98125-3_5 · Cited by 3
Les pratiques de recherche ouvertes en psychologie
Lantian, A. (2020) · Psychologie Française · doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2020.09.001 · Cited by 6
Kossmann, E., Veloso, M., & Suárez, M. G. (2021) · Journal of Fair Trade · doi:10.13169/jfairtrade.3.1.0001 · Cited by 3
Avoiding Bias in the Search for Implicit Bias
Cyrus-Lai, W., Tierney, W., du Plessis, C., Nguyen, M., Schaerer, M., Clemente, E. G., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2022) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2022.2106762 · Cited by 3
Pogge, G. C., & Smith, C. T. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103914 · Cited by 3
Comment on: Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results
Francis, G. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.008 · Cited by 3
The Emergence of Forensic ObjectivityPreprint
Peterson, D. (2016) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/2ft8x · Cited by 3
Clinical Science and the Replicability CrisisPreprint
Tackett, J. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Johnson, S. L., Krueger, R. F., Miller, J. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Shrout, P. E. (2016) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/uwus7 · Cited by 3
Response to Commentaries on Sakaluk (2020)
Sakaluk, J. K. (2021) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02020-w · Cited by 2
Sample size determination for Bayesian testing of informative hypothesis in linear regression modelsPreprint
Fu, Q. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3tr5f · Cited by 3
Open Science in phonetics and phonologyPreprint
Coretta, S. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/4dz5t · Cited by 3
Publication Bias in Meta-Analyses from Psychology and Medicine: A Meta-Meta-AnalysisPreprint
van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/czdp3 · Cited by 4
Hussey, I. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/g2x9p · Cited by 3
Bidirectional associations between Tibetan Buddhism and vertical space.
Guan, F., Xu, Z., Zhang, B., Yan, W., & Peng, K. (2020) · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · doi:10.1037/rel0000367 · Cited by 2
The Determinants of Public Sector Innovation in Malaysia: A Proposed Framework
Ibrahim, N. S., & Tajuddin, A. F. A. (2020) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i9/7877 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 543-554
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2157668596
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 49.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016-125-385)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Keywords
- null hypothesis significance testing, statistical power, publication bias, questionable research practices, false positives, meta-analysis, replication, sample size, p-values, research integrity, editorial policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
