The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science
Open accessAbstract
If science were a game, a dominant rule would probably be to collect results that are statistically significant. Several reviews of the psychological literature have shown that around 96% of papers involving the use of null hypothesis significance testing report significant outcomes for their main results but that the typical studies are insufficiently powerful for such a track record. We explain this paradox by showing that the use of several small underpowered samples often represents a more efficient research strategy (in terms of finding p < .05) than does the use of one larger (more powerful) sample. Publication bias and the most efficient strategy lead to inflated effects and high rates of false positives, especially when researchers also resorted to questionable research practices, such as adding participants after intermediate testing. We provide simulations that highlight the severity of such biases in meta-analyses. We consider 13 meta-analyses covering 281 primary studies in various fields of psychology and find indications of biases and/or an excess of significant results in seven. These results highlight the need for sufficiently powerful replications and changes in journal policies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also, the publication culture promotes novel, and often surprising, findings and this will motivate researchers to postulate improbable hypotheses (20).”
From Statistical and Methodological Considerations for the Interpretation of Intranasal Oxytocin Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“From a statistical point of view this problem might not be any more serious for this field than other domains of psychology (20, 21, 31) or neuroscience in general (14).”
From Statistical and Methodological Considerations for the Interpretation of Intranasal Oxytocin Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, one pervasive problem in the social sciences, including psychology, that threatens the accuracy of meta-analytic estimates is publication bias (Bakker et al., 2012; Franco et al., 2014, 2016)”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“Given that publication bias and researcher degrees of freedom are understood to be pervasive problems in psychological science (Bakker et al., 2012; Franco et al., 2014, 2016; Hesse, 2018; John et al., 2012), unadjusted effect sizes are likely to be overestimated (Kvarven et al., 2020).”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal
Ndiaye, M., Lespez, L., Tribolo, C., Rassé, M., Hadjas, I., Davidoux, S., Huysecom, É., & Douze, K. (2024) · Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000667478 · Cited by 24,214
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2004) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,289
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · Cited by 5,815
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 3×
“Such practices lead to inflated ESs and increased false positive rates (Ioannidis, 2005, 2008b; Simmons et al., 2011).”
BackgroundResultCohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015575 · Cited by 3,257
Belief in the law of small numbers.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031322 · Cited by 3,246
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.128 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 799
Bakker, M., Cramer, A. O. J., Matzke, D., Kievit, R., van der Maas, H. L. J., Wagenmakers, E., & Borsboom, D. (2013) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1920 · Cited by 13
Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way
Romero, F., & Sprenger, J. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02697-x · Cited by 16
Visual Perceptual Load Does Not Affect the Frequency Mismatch Negativity
Wiens, S., van Berlekom, E., Szychowska, M., & Eklund, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01970 · Cited by 17
Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative CriminologyPreprint
Chin, J. M., Pickett, J. T., Vazire, S., & Holcombe, A. O. (2021) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/bwm7s · Cited by 12
Improving statistical reporting in psychology
Schubert, A., Snijder-Steinhilber, M., Kang, H., & Quintana, D. S. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-025-00356-w · Cited by 20
How Do Vape Advertising Campaigns Affect Consumers’ Vaping Tendency? A Meta-Analytic Investigation
Yang, Z., Velasco, F., Tanner, E. C., & Tanner, J. F. (2023) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/07439156231189181 · Cited by 13
Paap, K. R., Majoubi, J., Balakrishnan, N., & Anders-Jefferson, R. T. (2024) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/13670069231214599 · Cited by 20
McLean, K. C. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197764640.001.0001 · Cited by 16
The Automaticity of Habitual Behaviours: Inconvenient Questions
Trafimow, D. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_21 · Cited by 13
The dual-system theory of bipolar spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis
Katz, B. A., Naftalovich, H., Matanky, K., & Yovel, I. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101945 · Cited by 13
Improving the reproducibility of findings by updating research methodology
Klein, J. (2021) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01196-6 · Cited by 19
Convergence in the Bilingual Lexicon: A Pre-registered Replication of Previous Studies
White, A., Malt, B. C., & Storms, G. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02081 · Cited by 13
Toward a Science of Failure Analysis: A Narrative Review
Allen‐Platt, C., Gerstner, C. E., Boruch, R. F., & Ruby, A. (2021) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x20985074 · Cited by 15
How to True Psychology’s Objects
Morawski, J. G. (2021) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680211046518 · Cited by 14
Evidenzbasierte | evidenzinformierte Gesundheitskommunikation
Erfurt, D. G. F. P. U. K. 2., Stehr, P., Heinemeier, D., Rossmann, C., & Verlagsgesellschaft, N. (2018) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783845291963 · Cited by 12
Psychological science’s replicability crisis and what it means for science in the courtroomPreprint
Chin, J. M. (2017) · doi:10.31228/osf.io/afrz4 · Cited by 13
p-Hacking and Publication Bias Interact to Distort Meta-Analytic Effect Size EstimatesPreprint
Friese, M., & Frankenbach, J. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bvm58 · Cited by 15
Maximizing the Reproducibility of Your Research
Open Science Collaboration (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119095910.ch1 · Cited by 15
The winner's curse and related perils of low statistical power − spelled out and illustrated
Lindstromberg, S. (2023) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100059 · Cited by 16
Geukes, K., Schönbrodt, F. D., Utesch, T., Geukes, S., & Back, M. D. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie · doi:10.1026/1612-5010/a000167 · Cited by 15
Publication Bias in Meta-Analyses of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Interventions
Niemeyer, H., van Aert, R. C. M., Schmid, S., Ülsmann, D., Knaevelsrud, C., & Schulte‐Herbrüggen, O. (2020) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2018.884 · Cited by 12
Measurement practices in hallucinations research
Smailes, D., Alderson‐Day, B., Hazell, C. M., Wright, A. C., & Moseley, P. (2021) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546805.2021.1999224 · Cited by 14
Objectivity for the research worker
van Dongen, N. N. N., & Sikorski, M. (2021) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00400-6 · Cited by 21
The Impact of Affect on Out-Group Judgments Depends on Dominant Information-Processing Styles
Isbell, L. M., Lair, E. C., & Rovenpor, D. R. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216634061 · Cited by 12
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: Kuhn’s misconceptions of (normal) science
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Sanbonmatsu, K. K. (2017) · Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1037/teo0000059 · Cited by 11
Jacobucci, R., Brandmaier, A. M., & Kievit, R. (2019) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · doi:10.17863/cam.39567 · Cited by 12
Bayesian Analysis in Strategic Management Research: Time to Update Your Priors
McCann, B. T., & Schwab, A. (2023) · Strategic Management Review · doi:10.1561/111.00000053 · Cited by 12
Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null, and Why Many of the Things You Think Are True, Aren't
Heene, M., & Ferguson, C. J. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119095910.ch3 · Cited by 12
Nuijten, M. B., Bakker, M., Maassen, E., & Wicherts, J. M. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fuzkh · Cited by 12
Reliability and correlates of intra-individual variability in the oculomotor system
Perquin, M. N., & Bompas, A. (2019) · Journal of Eye Movement Research · doi:10.16910/jemr.12.6.11 · Cited by 11
Exploring the scientific impact of negative results
Tian, D., Hu, X., Qian, Y., & Li, J. (2024) · J. Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2023.101481 · Cited by 7
Wegener, D. T., Pek, J. C. X., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307999 · Cited by 12
Forschungstransparenz als hohes wissenschaftliches Gut stärken
Schönbrodt, F. D., Maier, M., Heene, M., & Bühner, M. (2018) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000386 · Cited by 12
Retro-priming, priming, and double testing: psi and replication in a test–retest design
Rabeyron, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00154 · Cited by 11
Campbell, H., & Gustafson, P. (2019) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2018.1555101 · Cited by 12
Shepperd, J. A., Pogge, G. C., Lipsey, N. P., Smith, C. T., & Miller, W. A. (2019) · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · doi:10.1037/rel0000271 · Cited by 11
Realizing the promises of replication studies in education
Morrison, K. (2019) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2020.1838300 · Cited by 11
Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology.
Pramanik, S., & Johnson, V. E. (2022) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000482 · Cited by 11
Integrative Data Analysis for Research in Developmental Psychopathology
Mun, E., Jiao, Y., & Xie, M. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy123 · Cited by 11
Psychology’s Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological SciencePreprint
Tackett, J. L., Brandes, C. M., King, K. M., & Markon, K. E. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kc8xt · Cited by 16
How Powerful is the Evidence in Criminology? On Whether We Should Fear a Coming Crisis of ConfidencePreprint
Barnes, J. C. (2017) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/qmeba · Cited by 11
Efendić, E., Chandrashekar, S. P., Lee, C. S., Yeung, L. Y., Kim, M. J., Lee, C. Y., & Feldman, G. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506211056761 · Cited by 10
Is forensic science in crisis?
Sikorski, M. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03685-z · Cited by 13
Seiffert, D. J., Veach, P. M., LeRoy, B. S., Guan, W., & Zierhut, H. A. (2019) · Journal of Genetic Counseling · doi:10.1002/jgc4.1048 · Cited by 10
Case sampling for psychotherapy practice, theory, and policy guidance: Qualities and quantities
Krause, M. S. (2015) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1051161 · Cited by 10
Bakker, M. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.006 · Cited by 11
The Impact of P -hacking on “Redefine Statistical Significance”
Crane, H. (2018) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2018.1474111 · Cited by 11
Small Sample Corrections for Wald Tests in Latent Variable Models
Ozenne, B., Fisher, P. M., & Budtz–Jørgensen, E. (2020) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.1111/rssc.12414 · Cited by 10
West, S. J., Hyatt, C. S., Miller, J. D., & Chester, D. S. (2020) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21937 · Cited by 10
Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
Witte, E. H., & Zenker, F. (2018) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x18000924 · Cited by 10
Ting, C., & Greenland, S. (2024) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470241239947 · Cited by 11
Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach
van Aert, R. C. M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02132-2 · Cited by 13
Hengartner, M. P. (2017) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00003 · Cited by 9
Do red objects enhance sexual attractiveness? No evidence from two large replications
Pollet, T. V., Costello, J., Groeneboom, L., Peperkoorn, L. S., & Wu, J. (2018) · Displays · doi:10.1016/j.displa.2018.10.008 · Cited by 9
An Empirical Review of Research and Reporting Practices in Psychological Meta-Analyses
Hohn, R. E., Slaney, K. L., & Tafreshi, D. (2020) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/1089268020918844 · Cited by 8
Szychowska, M., & Wiens, S. (2020) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113240 · Cited by 8
Akin, B. A., Testa, M. F., McDonald, T. P., Melz, H., Blasé, K. A., & Barclay, A. (2014) · Journal of Public Child Welfare · doi:10.1080/15548732.2014.939250 · Cited by 9
A Plea for Preregistration in Personality Disorders Research: The Case of Psychopathy
Verschuère, B., Yasrebi, F., van Zelm, I., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2019) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi_2019_33_426 · Cited by 10
Fisher, W. P. (2021) · Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics · doi:10.1177/02601079211033475 · Cited by 12
Hurley, P. J. (2022) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-2021-028 · Cited by 12
Neoh, M. J. Y., Carollo, A., Lee, A., & Esposito, G. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.230677 · Cited by 13
CYRANKA, K. M., Rutkowski, K., Mielimąka, M., Sobański, J. A., Klasa, K., Müldner-Nieckowski, Ł., Dembińska, E., Smiatek-Mazgaj, B., & Rodziński, P. (2015) · Psychiatria Polska · doi:10.12740/pp/onlinefirst/40020 · Cited by 9
Hypothesis Testing in the Real World
Miller, J. O. (2016) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164416667984 · Cited by 9
Die Vertrauenskrise empirischer Forschung in der Psychologie
Schweizer, G., & Furley, P. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie · doi:10.1026/1612-5010/a000171 · Cited by 9
Zech, A., Bühner, M., Kröner, S., Heene, M., & Hilbert, S. (2017) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence5020022 · Cited by 9
Grahe, J. E., & Cuccolo, K. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009000796.014 · Cited by 9
Strengths and Weaknesses of Meta-AnalysesPreprint
Corker, K. S. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6gcnm · Cited by 10
Mortality salience in an offline and online setting
Chew, P. K. H., & Yap, B. L. M. (2022) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2021.1888826 · Cited by 8
Pre-testing effects are target-specific and are not driven by a generalised state of curiosity
Hollins, T. J., Seabrooke, T., Inkster, A. B., Wills, A. J., & Mitchell, C. J. (2022) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2022.2153141 · Cited by 8
Gender and entrepreneurship amongst refugee women entrepreneurs in Glasgow, Scotland
Bikorimana, C., & Nziku, D. M. (2023) · Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne · doi:10.26485/spe/2023/127/7 · Cited by 8
Weerdt, D. D., Simons, M., Struyf, E., & Tack, H. (2024) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543241262807 · Cited by 16
Sun, Y., Shen, L., Pan, Z., & Qian, S. (2025) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502241308599 · Cited by 8
Lengersdorff, L., & Lamm, C. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459241296397 · Cited by 7
Riesthuis, P., Otgaar, H., & Bücken, C. A. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02646-x · Cited by 16
Kleinberg, B., Warmelink, L., Arntz, A. R., & Verschuère, B. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3439 · Cited by 7
Empirical Research in Affective Computing: An Analysis of Research Practices and Recommendations
Wessler, J., Schneeberger, T., Hilpert, B., Alles, A., & Gebhard, P. (2021) · International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops · doi:10.1109/acii52823.2021.9597418 · Cited by 9
Science’s Reproducibility and Replicability Crisis: International Business Is Not Immune
Aguinis, H., Cascio, W. F., & Ramani, R. S. (2019) · JIBS special collections · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22113-3_2 · Cited by 8
Reis, D., & Friese, M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_5 · Cited by 12
I Never Promised You a Rose Garden: When Research Questions Ought to Change
MacIntosh, R., Bartunek, J. M., Bhatt, M., & MacLean, D. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0897-301620160000024003 · Cited by 8
Die New Statistics in der Psychologie
Schäfer, T. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000184 · Cited by 8
Allen, P., Finlay, J., Roberts, L. D., & Baughman, F. D. (2019) · Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology · doi:10.1037/stl0000132 · Cited by 10
Friedel, E., Walter, H., Veer, I. M., Zimmermann, U. S., Heinz, A., Frieling, H., & Zindler, T. (2020) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.14354 · Cited by 8
van Aert, R. C. M., & Niemeyer, H. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_10 · Cited by 10
A meta-analytical answer to the crisis of confidence of Psychology
Botella, J., & Durán, J. I. (2019) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.35.2.345291 · Cited by 10
Niezamierzone konsekwencje punktozy jako wartości kulturowej polskiej społeczności akademickiej
Kulikowski, K., & Antipow, E. (2020) · Studia Socjologiczne · doi:10.24425/sts.2020.132476 · Cited by 9
Montoya, A. K., Charlton, A., Krefeld-Schwalb, A., Price, J., & Hilgard, J. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ck2r5 · Cited by 7
A Reappraisal of the Threshold Hypothesis of Creativity and IntelligencePreprint
Weiss, S., Steger, D., Schroeders, U., & Wilhelm, O. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/89bv5 · Cited by 8
Strengths and Weaknesses of Meta-Analyses
Corker, K. S. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190938550.003.0006 · Cited by 16
Krause, M. S. (2016) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2016.1222459 · Cited by 7
Sen, U., & Gredebäck, G. (2022) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13850 · Cited by 7
Going beyond simplicity: Using machine learning to predict belief in conspiracy theories
Brandenstein, N. (2022) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2859 · Cited by 9
Critical Values Robust to P-Hacking
McCloskey, A., & Michaillat, P. (2024) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01456 · Cited by 11
Rethinking priming in social psychology: Insight from James' notions of habits and instincts
Friesen, L., & Cresswell, J. (2015) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.09.001 · Cited by 8
Beyond the coin toss: Examining Wiseman’s criticisms of parapsychology.
Baptista, J., & Derakhshani, M. (2014) · Journal of Parapsychology · Cited by 7
La subordinación ideológica del saber médico andino en la salud intercultural chilena
Rivera, C. P., Concha, N. P. L., & Quenaya, B. M. (2019) · Polis (Santiago) · doi:10.32735/s0718-6568/2019-n54-1407 · Cited by 7
Hengartner, M. P., & Yamanaka, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00009 · Cited by 7
Tsuji, S., Cristià, A., Frank, M. C., & Bergmann, C. (2019) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/q5axy · Cited by 8
Variable Selection in Structural Equation Models with Regularized MIMIC ModelsPreprint
Jacobucci, R., Kievit, R., & Brandmaier, A. M. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bxzjf · Cited by 7
Successful Prediction Is Associated With Enhanced Encoding
Poskanzer, C., Tarder-Stoll, H., Javid, R., Spolaore, E., & Aly, M. (2025) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi.a.15 · Cited by 6
Publication bias and low power in field studies on goal priming
Shanks, D. R., & Vadillo, M. A. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.210544 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 543-554
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2157668596
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 49.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016-125-385)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Keywords
- null hypothesis significance testing, statistical power, publication bias, questionable research practices, false positives, meta-analysis, replication, sample size, p-values, research integrity, editorial policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
