The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science
Open accessAbstract
If science were a game, a dominant rule would probably be to collect results that are statistically significant. Several reviews of the psychological literature have shown that around 96% of papers involving the use of null hypothesis significance testing report significant outcomes for their main results but that the typical studies are insufficiently powerful for such a track record. We explain this paradox by showing that the use of several small underpowered samples often represents a more efficient research strategy (in terms of finding p < .05) than does the use of one larger (more powerful) sample. Publication bias and the most efficient strategy lead to inflated effects and high rates of false positives, especially when researchers also resorted to questionable research practices, such as adding participants after intermediate testing. We provide simulations that highlight the severity of such biases in meta-analyses. We consider 13 meta-analyses covering 281 primary studies in various fields of psychology and find indications of biases and/or an excess of significant results in seven. These results highlight the need for sufficiently powerful replications and changes in journal policies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also, the publication culture promotes novel, and often surprising, findings and this will motivate researchers to postulate improbable hypotheses (20).”
From Statistical and Methodological Considerations for the Interpretation of Intranasal Oxytocin Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“From a statistical point of view this problem might not be any more serious for this field than other domains of psychology (20, 21, 31) or neuroscience in general (14).”
From Statistical and Methodological Considerations for the Interpretation of Intranasal Oxytocin Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, one pervasive problem in the social sciences, including psychology, that threatens the accuracy of meta-analytic estimates is publication bias (Bakker et al., 2012; Franco et al., 2014, 2016)”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“Given that publication bias and researcher degrees of freedom are understood to be pervasive problems in psychological science (Bakker et al., 2012; Franco et al., 2014, 2016; Hesse, 2018; John et al., 2012), unadjusted effect sizes are likely to be overestimated (Kvarven et al., 2020).”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal
Ndiaye, M., Lespez, L., Tribolo, C., Rassé, M., Hadjas, I., Davidoux, S., Huysecom, É., & Douze, K. (2024) · Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000667478 · Cited by 24,214
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2004) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,289
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · Cited by 5,815
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 3×
“Such practices lead to inflated ESs and increased false positive rates (Ioannidis, 2005, 2008b; Simmons et al., 2011).”
BackgroundResultCohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015575 · Cited by 3,257
Belief in the law of small numbers.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031322 · Cited by 3,246
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.128 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 799
Anderson, S. F., & Maxwell, S. (2017) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2017.1289361 · Cited by 116
Research Practices That Can Prevent an Inflation of False-Positive Rates
Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., & Fiedler, K. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868313496330 · Cited by 124
The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science
Francis, G. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0601-x · Cited by 130
Quality Uncertainty Erodes Trust in Science
Vazire, S. (2017) · Collabra: Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.74 · Cited by 106
P-hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates
Friese, M., & Frankenbach, J. (2020) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000246 · Cited by 122
Nieuwland, M. S. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.019 · Cited by 123
Replicating Studies in Which Samples of Participants Respond to Samples of Stimuli
Westfall, J., Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614564879 · Cited by 133
Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p -hacking strategies
Stefan, A. M., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.220346 · Cited by 177
Common methodological mistakes
Wulff, J. N., Sajons, G. B., Pogrebna, G., Lonati, S., Bastardoz, N., Banks, G. C., & Antonakis, J. (2023) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101677 · Cited by 136
Replicability Crisis in Social Psychology: Looking at the Past to Find New Pathways for the Future
Świątkowski, W., & Dompnier, B. (2017) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.66 · Cited by 132
The effect of horizontal eye movements on free recall: a preregistered adversarial collaboration.
Matzke, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., van Rijn, H., Slagter, H., van der Molen, M. W., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/xge0000038 · Cited by 148
Quantifying Support for the Null Hypothesis in Psychology: An Empirical Investigation
Aczél, B., Pálfi, B., Szollosi, A., Kovács, M., Szászi, B., Szécsi, P., Zrubka, M., Gronau, Q. F., van den Bergh, D., & Wagenmakers, E. (2018) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245918773742 · Cited by 122
Reputation management: Why and how gossip enhances generosity
Wu, J., Balliet, D. P., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2015) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.11.001 · Cited by 115
Katz, B. A., Matanky, K., Aviram, G., & Yovel, I. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101842 · Cited by 109
van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Nuijten, M. B., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084896 · Cited by 113
The Bitter Truth About Sugar and Willpower
Vadillo, M. A., Gold, N., & Osman, M. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616654911 · Cited by 107
Correcting for Publication Bias in a Meta-Analysis with the P-uniform* MethodPreprint
van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2018) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/zqjr9 · Cited by 108
Cipora, K., & Nuerk, H. (2013) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.772215 · Cited by 106
Everett, J. A. C., & Earp, B. D. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01152 · Cited by 105
Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research
Hardwicke, T. E., Serghiou, S., Janiaud, P., Danchev, V., Crüwell, S., Goodman, S. N., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2020) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-031219-041104 · Cited by 98
ON NORMATIVITY AND EPISTEMIC INTUITIONS: FAILURE OF REPLICATION
Seyedsayamdost, H. (2014) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2014.27 · Cited by 102
Outlier Removal and the Relation with Reporting Errors and Quality of Psychological Research
Bakker, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103360 · Cited by 101
Self-citationSchmidt, F. L., & Oh, I.-S. (2016) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000029 · Cited by 145
A Call for Examining Replication and Bias in Special Education Research
Cook, B. G. (2014) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932514528995 · Cited by 100
Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E., & van Rijn, H. (2015) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003144 · Cited by 105
Tuk, M. A., Zhang, K., & Sweldens, S. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000065 · Cited by 96
An Aberrant Abundance of Cronbach’s Alpha Values at .70
Hussey, I., Alsalti, T., Bosco, F. A., Elson, M., & Arslan, R. C. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459241287123 · Cited by 197
Pollet, T., & van der Meij, L. (2016) · Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40750-016-0050-z · Cited by 94
Flore, P. C., Mulder, J., & Wicherts, J. M. (2018) · Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/23743603.2018.1559647 · Cited by 105
Mesquida, C., Murphy, J., Lakens, D., & Warne, J. P. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.220946 · Cited by 110
The application of Goal Setting Theory to goal setting interventions in sport: a systematic review
Jeong, Y. H., Healy, L. C., & McEwan, D. (2023) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2021.1901298 · Cited by 113
Cybulski, Ł., Mayo‐Wilson, E., & Grant, S. (2016) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000115 · Cited by 94
Addressing Methodological Challenges in Culture-Comparative Research
Fischer, R. D., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2018) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022117738086 · Cited by 92
van den Akker, O. R., van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Vugt, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2020.102329 · Cited by 90
Tóth‐Király, I., Bőthe, B., Márki, A. N., Rigó, A., & Orosz, G. (2019) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2588 · Cited by 84
On gender and philosophical intuition: Failure of replication and other negative results
Seyedsayamdost, H. (2015) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2014.893288 · Cited by 52
Maniadis, Z., Tufano, F., & List, J. A. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12527 · Cited by 87
Paap, K. R. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.891597 · Cited by 85
Dietz, T., Auffenberg, J., Chong, A. E., Grabs, J., & Kilian, B. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.026 · Cited by 90
Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology
Maassen, E., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Nuijten, M. B., Olsson-Collentine, A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233107 · Cited by 90
Research Design in Clinical Psychology
Kazdin, A. E. (2021) · doi:10.1017/9781108993647 · Cited by 240
The impact of sample size on the reproducibility of voxel-based lesion-deficit mappings
Lorca‐Puls, D. L., Gajardo‐Vidal, A., White, J., Seghier, M. L., Leff, A. P., Green, D. W., Crinion, J., Ludersdorfer, P., Hope, T. M. H., Bowman, H., et al. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.014 · Cited by 86
A comprehensive meta-analysis of money priming.
Lodder, P., Ong, H. H., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wicherts, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000570 · Cited by 86
The effect of working memory maintenance on long-term memory
Hartshorne, J. K., & Makovski, T. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00908-6 · Cited by 81
Wagenmakers, E., Verhagen, J., Ly, A., Bakker, M., Lee, M. D., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0517-4 · Cited by 83
Englert, C., Bertrams, A., Furley, P., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2014) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.12.001 · Cited by 89
Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology
Jussim, L. J., Crawford, J. T., Anglin, S. M., Stevens, S. T., & Duarte, J. L. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.003 · Cited by 84
Sijtsma, K. (2015) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0 · Cited by 88
Gieseler, K., Loschelder, D. D., & Friese, M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_1 · Cited by 80
Development of the first-mention bias
Hartshorne, J. K., Nappa, R., & Snedeker, J. (2014) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000914000075 · Cited by 78
Jacobucci, R., Brandmaier, A. M., & Kievit, R. (2019) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245919826527 · Cited by 78
Frederick, D. A., Daniels, E. A., Bates, M. E., & Tylka, T. L. (2017) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.10.006 · Cited by 87
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for unaware fear conditioning
Mertens, G., & Engelhard, I. M. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.012 · Cited by 81
Frost, A. D. S., & Ledgerwood, A. (2020) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1017/prp.2020.7 · Cited by 75
Azari, B., Westlin, C., Satpute, A. B., Hutchinson, J. B., Kragel, P. A., Hoemann, K., Khan, Z., Wormwood, J. B., Quigley, K. S., Deniz Erdogmus, B., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77117-8 · Cited by 83
Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect resultsPreprint
Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E. C., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., et al. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qkwst · Cited by 78
Heterogeneity in effect size estimates
Holzmeister, F., Johannesson, M., BOHM, R. M., Dreber, A., Huber, J., & Kirchler, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2403490121 · Cited by 89
Fortuin, J., van Geel, M., & Vedder, P. H. (2014) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0168-x · Cited by 81
Memory Detection 2.0: The First Web-Based Memory Detection Test
Kleinberg, B., & Verschuère, B. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118715 · Cited by 75
Pickett, J. T., & Roche, S. P. (2016) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9886-2 · Cited by 77
Assessing co-creation in strategic planning for urban energy transitions
Sillak, S., Borch, K., & Sperling, K. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101952 · Cited by 71
Open Science Is Liberating and Can Foster Creativity
Frankenhuis, W. E., & Nettle, D. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618767878 · Cited by 74
The public's perception of run-of-the-river hydropower across Europe
Venus, T. E., Hinzmann, M., Bakken, T. H., Gerdes, H., Godinho, F. N., Hansen, B., Pinheiro, A. N., & Sauer, J. (2020) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111422 · Cited by 71
Ellemers, N. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1932 · Cited by 69
Optimizing sampling approaches along ecological gradients
Schweiger, A., Irl, S. D. H., Steinbauer, M. J., Dengler, J., & Beierkuhnlein, C. (2015) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12495 · Cited by 78
The Replication Paradox: Combining Studies can Decrease Accuracy of Effect Size Estimates
Nuijten, M. B., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Veldkamp, C. L. S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000034 · Cited by 73
The quest for an optimal alpha
Miller, J. O., & Ulrich, R. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208631 · Cited by 84
The replication crisis: How might philosophy and theory of psychology be of use?
Morawski, J. G. (2019) · Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1037/teo0000129 · Cited by 78
Peltola, M. J., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., Alink, L. R. A., Huffmeijer, R., Bı́ró, S., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2014) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.21223 · Cited by 68
Replication and Reproducibility in Cross-Cultural Psychology
Milfont, T. L., & Klein, R. A. (2018) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022117744892 · Cited by 69
Intergenerational conflicts of interest and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic
Jin, S., Balliet, D. P., Romano, A., Spadaro, G., Lissa, C. J. V., Agostini, M., Bélanger, J. J., Gützkow, B., Kreienkamp, J., Abakoumkin, G., et al. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110535 · Cited by 66
The significance fallacy in inferential statistics
Kühberger, A., Fritz, A., Lermer, E., & Scherndl, T. (2015) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1020-4 · Cited by 67
Matthes, J., Marquart, F., Naderer, B., Arendt, F., Schmuck, D., & Adam, K. (2015) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334 · Cited by 74
Romance, risk, and replication: Can consumer choices and risk-taking be primed by mating motives?
Shanks, D. R., Vadillo, M. A., Riedel, B., Clymo, A., Govind, S., Hickin, N., Tamman, A. J. F., & Puhlmann, L. M. C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000116 · Cited by 67
The role and value of replication in empirical software engineering results
Shepperd, M., Ajienka, N., & Counsell, S. (2018) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.01.006 · Cited by 67
Perceived crisis and reforms: Issues, explanations, and remedies.
de Boeck, P. A. L., & Jeon, M. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000154 · Cited by 71
Redefining Science: The Impact of Complexity on Theory Development in Social and Behavioral Research
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Johnston, W. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619848688 · Cited by 68
Project INTEGRATE: An integrative study of brief alcohol interventions for college students.
Mun, E., The Project INTEGRATE Team, TORRE, J. D. L., Atkins, D. C., WHITE, H. R., Ray, A. E., Kim, S. Y., Jiao, Y., Clarke, N., Huo, Y., et al. (2014) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000047 · Cited by 62
Additionality and Implementation Gaps in Voluntary Sustainability Standards
Dietz, T., & Grabs, J. (2021) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2021.1881473 · Cited by 62
van den Akker, O. R., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Bakker, M., Elsherif, M. M., Wong, T. K., & Wicherts, J. M. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02277-0 · Cited by 84
Benefits of Open and High-Powered Research Outweigh Costs
LeBel, E. P., Campbell, L., & Loving, T. J. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000049 · Cited by 67
The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
Pappas, L. N., & Dent, A. L. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z · Cited by 72
van der Zee, T., Anaya, J., & Brown, N. J. L. (2017) · BMC Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s40795-017-0167-x · Cited by 61
Héroux, M. E., Taylor, J. L., & Gandevia, S. C. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144151 · Cited by 62
Adelman, L., Leidner, B., Ünal, H., Nahhas, E. A. H., & Shnabel, N. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216662868 · Cited by 60
How Powerful is the Evidence in Criminology? On Whether We Should Fear a Coming Crisis of Confidence
Barnes, J. C., TenEyck, M. F., Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2019) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2018.1495252 · Cited by 62
Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study
van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175302 · Cited by 57
Nitschke, F., McKimmie, B. M., & Vanman, E. J. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000206 · Cited by 71
Science as collaborative knowledge generation
Ellemers, N. (2020) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12430 · Cited by 65
Retraction statements and research malpractice in economics
Cox, A., Craig, R., & Tourish, D. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.016 · Cited by 61
Gervais, W. M., Jewell, J. A., Najle, M. B., & Ng, B. K. L. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615584199 · Cited by 58
An a priori solution to the replication crisis
Trafimow, D. (2018) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2018.1490707 · Cited by 56
Davis-Kean, P. E., & Ellis, A. (2019) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101339 · Cited by 57
Fiedler, K. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2069 · Cited by 55
Paap, K. R., & Liu, Y. (2013) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.09.002 · Cited by 55
Social Integration, Social Support and Mortality in the US National Health Interview Survey
Barger, S. D. (2013) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e318292ad99 · Cited by 54
Hartanto, A., Toh, W. X., & Yang, H. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.007 · Cited by 55
A Reappraisal of the Threshold Hypothesis of Creativity and Intelligence
Weiss, S., Steger, D., Schroeders, U., & Wilhelm, O. (2020) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence8040038 · Cited by 55
Clinical Psychological Science
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2016) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702616673363 · Cited by 55
Glenn, C. R., Kleiman, E. M., Coppersmith, D. D. L., Santee, A. C., Esposito, E. C., Cha, C. B., Nock, M. K., & Auerbach, R. P. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12769 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 543-554
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2157668596
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 49.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016-125-385)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Keywords
- null hypothesis significance testing, statistical power, publication bias, questionable research practices, false positives, meta-analysis, replication, sample size, p-values, research integrity, editorial policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review