Cited by 389Behavioral Health and InterventionsEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityCultural Differences and Values

Mapping the Social-Norms Literature: An Overview of Reviews

Open access
Legros, Sophie, Cislaghi, Beniamino·2020·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

The theoretical literature on social norms is multifaceted and at times contradictory. Looking at existing reviews, we aimed to offer a more complete understanding of its current status. By investigating the conceptual frameworks and organizing elements used to compare social-norms theories, we identified four theoretical spaces of inquiry that were common across the reviews: what social norms are, what relationship exists between social norms and behavior, how social norms evolve, and what categories of actors must be considered in the study of social norms. We highlight areas of consensus and debate in the reviews around these four themes and discuss points of agreement and disagreement that uncover trajectories for future empirical and theoretical investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691619866455

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The various conceptualizations and operationalizations in the terror management theory literature do not allow a clear distinction between when a primed concept is a social norm and when it is a personal norm.

    “However, the various conceptualizations and operationalizations in the TMT literature do not allow a clear distinction between when a primed concept is a social norm and when it is a personal norm.”

    From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Legros & Cislaghi, 2020

    The Results section (‘What pathways of normative influence are commonly identified in the literature?’; page unavailable) reports disagreement over whether internalized personal norms count as social norms. That supports the general difficulty of distinguishing them, but the passage does not address conceptualizations or operationalizations in terror management theory, or whether a primed concept can be classified as one or the other. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Boyd R. Richerson P. J. (1994). The evolution of norms: An anthropological view. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/ Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 150, 72– 87.
  2. Hecter M. Opp K.-D. (Eds.). (2001). Social norms. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
  3. Hume D. (1978). A treatise of human nature (Selby-Bigge L. A., Ed.) (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1739)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Legros, S., & Cislaghi, B.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Cislaghi, Beniamino
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2019-11-07
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
62-80
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2971923619
Cited by
388
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
32.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
social norms, social norms theory, norm evolution, conceptual framework, theoretical debates, normative influence
MeSH terms
Humans, Review Literature as Topic, Social Behavior, Social Norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review