Cited by 1,424Behavioral Health and InterventionsPsychology of Social InfluenceEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

An Explication of Social Norms

Lapinski, Maria Knight, Rimal, Rajiv N.·2005·Communication Theory

Abstract

This article identifies four factors for consideration in norms-based research to enhance the predictive ability of theoretical models. First, it makes the distinction between perceived and collective norms and between descriptive and injunctive norms. Second, the article addresses the role of important moderators in the relationship between descriptive norms and behaviors, including outcome expectations, group identity, and ego involvement. Third, it discusses the role of both interpersonal and mass communication in normative influences. Lastly, it outlines behavioral attributes that determine susceptibility to normative influences, including behavioral ambiguity and the public or private nature of the behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results highlight the importance of distinguishing between types of social norms and examining their respective influences on social media behavior.

    “Second, they highlight the importance of distinguishing between types of social norms (Cialdini etal., 1991; Lapinski & Rimal, 2005) and examining their respective influences on social media behavior (see also Masur etal., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N.
Affiliations
  • Western Michigan University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Lapinski, Maria Knight
Venue
Communication Theory
Published
2005-05
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
127-147
ISSN
  • 1050-3293 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2885
OpenAlex
W2032926056
Cited by
1,424
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 38
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communication Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
social norms, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, perceived norms, collective norms, outcome expectations, group identity, ego-involvement, interpersonal communication, mass communication, normative influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review