Cited by 497Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationEconomic Theory and InstitutionsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The evolution of social norms

Open access
Young, H. Peyton·2015·Annual Review of Economics

Abstract

Social norms are patterns of behavior that are self-enforcing within a group: Everyone conforms, everyone is expected to conform, and everyone wants to conform when they expect everyone else to conform. Social norms are often sustained by multiple mechanisms, including a desire to coordinate, fear of being sanctioned, signaling membership in a group, or simply following the lead of others. This article shows how stochastic evolutionary game theory can be used to study the resulting dynamics. I illustrate with a variety of examples drawn from economics, sociology, demography, and political science. These include bargaining norms, norms governing the terms of contracts, norms of retirement, dueling, foot binding, medical treatment, and the use of contraceptives. These cases highlight the challenges of applying the theory to empirical cases. They also show that the modern theory of norm dynamics yields insights and predictions that go beyond conventional equilibrium analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115322

Cites

154 of 154 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pro-environmental norms can emerge and evolve as a result of individuals aligning their behavior with societal expectations.

    “Research in this area suggests that pro-environmental norms can emerge and evolve as a result of individuals aligning their behavior with societal expectations (Young, 2015)”

    From Orchestrating a smart circular economy: Guiding principles for digital product passports (2023) · cites this paper as Young, 2015

    The Overview says norms evolve through adaptation and that people adhere to them when they expect others to do so. Section 4.1 likewise says people adapt their behavior based on others’ behavior. The paper lists littering as an example of a norm, but does not establish this mechanism specifically for pro-environmental norms. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 156 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Axtell R, Epstein JM. 1999. Coordination in transient social networks: an agent-based computational model of the timing of retirement. In Behavioral Dimensions of Retirement Economics, ed. HJ Aaron, pp. 161-83.
  2. Bolton P, Dewatripont M. 2005. Contract Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  3. Brown LM. 2013. The diffusion of innovations: empirical and experimental evidence. PhD Diss., Univ. Oxford
  4. Durlauf SN. 1997. Statistical mechanical approaches to socioeconomic behavior. In The Economy as a Complex Evolving System, Vol. 2, ed. WB Arthur, SN Durlauf, D Lane, pp. 81-104. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley
  5. Jindani S. 2014. A game-theoretic approach to dueling and other social norms. MPhilos. Thesis, Dep. Econ., Oxford Univ.
  6. Kanazawa S, Still MC. 2001. The emergence of marriage norms: an evolutionary psychological perspective. See Hechter & Opp 2001, pp. 274-304
  7. Mallaby S. 2010. More Money Than God. London: Bloomsbury
  8. Posner EA. 2000. Law and Social Norms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  9. Schelling TC. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  10. Sugden R. 1986. The Economics of Rights, Cooperation and Welfare. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
  11. The Gains from Market Integration Dave Donaldson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 619 Valid Post-Selection and Post-Regularization Inference: An Elementary, General Approach Victor Chernozhukov, Christian Hansen, and Martin Spindler . . . . . . . . . 649 Indexes Cumulative Index of Contributing Authors, Volumes 3-7 689 Cumulative Index of Article Titles, Volumes 3-7 692 Errata An online log of corrections to Annual Review of Economics articles may be found at http:// www.annualreviews.org/errata/economics

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, H. P.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Young, H. Peyton
Venue
Annual Review of Economics
Published
2015-08-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
359-387
ISSN
  • 1941-1383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1391
OpenAlex
W2112082685
Cited by
497
References
156
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
social norms, norm dynamics, evolutionary game theory, coordination, sanctioning, signaling, conformity, contract terms, dueling, foot binding, medical treatment, contraceptive use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review