Psychological Science Is Not Race Neutral
Open accessAbstract
In their analysis in a previous issue of Perspectives on Psychological Science, Roberts and colleagues argued that the editors, authors, and participants throughout subfields of psychological science are overwhelmingly White. In this commentary, we consider some of the drivers and consequences of this racial inequality. Drawing on race scholarship from within and outside the field, we highlight three phenomena that create and maintain racial inequality in psychology: (a) racial ignorance, (b) threats to belonging, and (c) racial-progress narratives. We close by exploring steps that journals and authors can take to reduce racial inequality in our field, ending with an appeal to consider the experience of scholars of color in race scholarship and in psychological science more broadly.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445 · see citing works
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697 · see citing works
Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future
Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D., & Mortenson, E. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620927709 · Cited by 1,049 · see citing works
Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617708630 · Cited by 986 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This alone could help prevent researchers from relying exclusively on mostly White convenience samples (Rowley & Camacho, 2015) and help encourage making generalizability statements (a separate but related recommendation; Simons et al., 2017).”
BackgroundAmericans misperceive racial economic equality
Kraus, M. W., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1707719114 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Bias Awareness Predicts Color Conscious Racial Socialization Methods among White Parents
Perry, S. P., Skinner, A. L., & Abaied, J. L. (2019) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12348 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Increasing Diversity in Cognitive Developmental Research: Issues and Solutions
Rowley, S. J., & Camacho, T. C. (2015) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2014.976224 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Anti-racist actions and accountability: not more empty promises
Boykin, C. M., Brown, N. D., Carter, J. T., Dukes, K., Green, D. J., Harrison, T., Hebl, M., McCleary-Gaddy, A., Membere, A., McJunkins, C. A., et al. (2020) · Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/edi-06-2020-0158 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context
Moffitt, U., & Rogers, L. O. (2022) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12762 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dupree, C. H., & Kraus, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dupree, Cydney H.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-03-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 270-275
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W3133908965
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11
- FWCI
- 16.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- scholars of color, racial ignorance, diversity in psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review