Cited by 218Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchRace, History, and American Society

Americans misperceive racial economic equality

Open access
Kraus, Michael W., Rucker, Julian M., Richeson, Jennifer A.·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

= 1,377) sampling White and Black Americans from the top and bottom of the national income distribution, participants overestimated progress toward Black-White economic equality, largely driven by estimates of greater current equality than actually exists according to national statistics. Overestimates of current levels of racial economic equality, on average, outstripped reality by roughly 25% and were predicted by greater belief in a just world and social network racial diversity (among Black participants). Whereas high-income White respondents tended to overestimate racial economic equality in the past, Black respondents, on average, underestimated the degree of past racial economic equality. Two follow-up experiments further revealed that making societal racial discrimination salient increased the accuracy of Whites' estimates of Black-White economic equality, whereas encouraging Whites to anchor their estimates on their own circumstances increased their tendency to overestimate current racial economic equality. Overall, these findings suggest a profound misperception of and unfounded optimism regarding societal race-based economic equality-a misperception that is likely to have any number of important policy implications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1707719114

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pattillo-McCoy M (1999) Black Picket Fences: Privilege and Peril in the Black Middle Class Neighborhood (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kraus, M. W., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-09-18
Volume
114
Issue
39
Pages
10324-10331
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2756364188
Cited by
218
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
41.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University (School of Management, Department of Psychology)
  • National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
racial economic inequality, black-white disparities, belief in a just world, self-serving bias, income distribution, racial attitudes
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Demography, Female, Humans, Male, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Vulnerable Populations, White People, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review