Cited by 25Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

The Impact of Using Mobile-Enabled Devices on Patient Engagement in Remote Monitoring Programs

Open access
Agboola, Stephen, Havasy, Rob, Myint-U, Khinlei, Kvedar, Joseph, Jethwani, Kamal·2013·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background: Different types of data transmission technologies are used in remote monitoring (RM) programs. This study reports on a retrospective analysis of how participants engage, based on the type of data transfer technology used in a blood pressure (BP) RM program, and its potential impact on RM program design and outcomes. Methods: Thirty patients, aged 23–84 years (62 ± 14 years), who had completed at least 2 months in the program and were not participating in any other clinical trial were identified from the Remote Monitoring Data Repository. Half of these patients used wireless-based data transfer devices [wireless-based device (WBD)] while the other half used telephone modem-based data transfer devices [modem-based device (MBD)]. Participants were matched by practice and age. Engagement indices, which include frequency of BP measurements, frequency of data uploads, time to first BP measurement, and time to first data upload, were compared in both groups using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney two-sample rank-sum test. Help desk call data were analyzed by Chi square test. Results: The frequency of BP measurements and data uploads was significantly higher in the WBD group versus the MBD group [median = 0.66 versus 0.2 measurements/day ( p = .01) and 0.46 versus 0.01 uploads/day ( p < .001), respectively]. Time to first upload was significantly lower in the WBD group (median = 4 versus 7 days; p = .02), but time to first BP measurement did not differ between the two groups (median = 2 versus 1 day; p = .98). Conclusion: Wireless transmission ensures instantaneous transmission of readings, providing clinicians timely data to intervene on. Our findings suggest that mobile-enabled wireless technologies can positively impact patient engagement, outcomes, and operational workflow in RM programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/193229681300700306

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agboola, S., Havasy, R., Myint-U, K., Kvedar, J., & Jethwani, K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Partners HealthCare Connected Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2013-05
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
623-629
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140063459
Cited by
25
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, patient engagement, blood pressure monitoring, wireless data transmission
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure, Modems, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Retrospective Studies, Remote Consultation, Information Dissemination, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review