Cited by 47Diabetes Management and ResearchIntravenous Infusion Technology and SafetyPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Accuracy of a New Patch Pump Based on a Microelectromechanical System (MEMS) Compared to Other Commercially Available Insulin Pumps: Results of the First In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

Open access
Borot, Sophie, Franc, Sylvia, Cristante, Justine, Penfornis, Alfred, Benhamou, Pierre-Yves, Guerci, Bruno, Hanaire, Hélène, Renard, Eric +4 more·2014·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

The JewelPUMP™ (JP) is a new patch pump based on a microelectromechanical system that operates without any plunger. The study aimed to evaluate the infusion accuracy of the JP in vitro and in vivo. For the in vitro studies, commercially available pumps meeting the ISO standard were compared to the JP: the MiniMed® Paradigm® 712 (MP), Accu-Chek® Combo (AC), OmniPod® (OP), Animas® Vibe™ (AN). Pump accuracy was measured over 24 hours using a continuous microweighing method, at 0.1 and 1 IU/h basal rates. The occlusion alarm threshold was measured after a catheter occlusion. The JP, filled with physiological serum, was then tested in 13 patients with type 1 diabetes simultaneously with their own pump for 2 days. The weight difference was used to calculate the infused insulin volume. The JP showed reduced absolute median error rate in vitro over a 15-minute observation window compared to other pumps (1 IU/h): ±1.02% (JP) vs ±1.60% (AN), ±1.66% (AC), ±2.22% (MP), and ±4.63% (OP), P < .0001. But there was no difference over 24 hours. At 0.5 IU/h, the JP was able to detect an occlusion earlier than other pumps: 21 (19; 25) minutes vs 90 (85; 95), 58 (42; 74), and 143 (132; 218) minutes (AN, AC, MP), P < .05 vs AN and MP. In patients, the 24-hour flow error was not significantly different between the JP and usual pumps (-2.2 ± 5.6% vs -0.37 ± 4.0%, P = .25). The JP was found to be easier to wear than conventional pumps. The JP is more precise over a short time period, more sensitive t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932296814543946

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borot, S., Franc, S., Cristante, J., Penfornis, A., Benhamou, P.-Y., Guerci, B., Hanaire, H., Renard, E., Reznik, Y., Simon, C., Charpentier, G., & on behalf of the Diabeloop Study Group
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien (FR)
  • Université Joseph Fourier (FR)
  • Université de Lorraine (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
  • Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition and Clinical Investigation Centre, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie (FR)
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2014-07-30
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
1133-1141
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029870085
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
infusion accuracy, type 1 diabetes, artificial pancreas, patient acceptability, pump comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Patient Satisfaction, Micro-Electrical-Mechanical Systems, Transdermal Patch, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review