Cited by 23Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

The first regulatory clearance of an open-source automated insulin delivery algorithm

Open access
Braune, Katarina, Hussain, Sufyan, Lal, Rayhan·2023·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Open-source Automated Insulin Dosing (OS-AID) algorithms are made publicly accessible so that every facet of their operation can be understood. Currently, commercial AID algorithms are kept proprietary trade secrets, despite the role they take in making life and death decisions for people living with type 1 diabetes. Loop was the second OS-AID algorithm, developed initially by Nate Racklyeft and Pete Schwamb. In 2018, the nonprofit organization Tidepool (Palo Alto, CA) announced the launch of the “Tidepool Loop” initiative with the aim to generate real-world evidence and obtain regulatory clearance. By the end of 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration received Tidepool’s application for an interoperable automated glycemic controller based on Loop. After 2 years, the FDA approved the Tidepool Loop on January 23, 2023.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/19322968231164166

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prospective real-world data from 558 adults and children with type 1 diabetes on Loop was used to support FDA clearance of Tidepool Loop.

    “Prospective realworld data from 558 adults and children with type 1 diabetes on this system (255) was used to support the FDA clearance of a variant called Tidepool Loop (259).”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [259]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braune, K., Hussain, S., & Lal, R.
Affiliations
  • Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Lal, Rayhan
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2023-04-13
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1139-1141
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4365444122
Cited by
23
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • national institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases (1K23DK122017)
  • Bioengineering and Behavioral Sciences working group for the Stanford Diabetes Research Center (P30 DK116074)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
artificial pancreas, open source software, type 1 diabetes, FDA approval, interoperability, real-world evidence
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Insulin, Regular, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review