CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 346Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementGynecological conditions and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Priorities for Endometriosis Research: Recommendations From an International Consensus Workshop

Open access
Rogers, Peter A. W., D’Hooghe, Thomas M., Fazleabas, Asgerally, Gargett, Caroline E., Giudice, Linda C., Montgomery, Grant W., Rombauts, Luk, Salamonsen, Lois A., Zondervan, Krina T.·2009·Reproductive Sciences
DOI 10.1177/1933719108330568PMC PMC3682634
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disorder where endometrial tissue forms lesions outside the uterus. Endometriosis affects an estimated 10% of women in the reproductive-age group, rising to 30% to 50% in patients with infertility and/or pain, with significant impact on their physical, mental, and social well-being. There is no known cure, and most current medical treatments are not suitable long term due to their side-effect profiles. Endometriosis has an estimated annual cost in the United States of $18.8 to $22 billion (2002 figures). Although endometriosis was first described more than 100 years ago, current knowledge of its pathogenesis, spontaneous evolution, and the pathophysiology of the related infertility and pelvic pain, remain unclear. A consensus workshop was convened following the 10th World Congress on Endometriosis to establish recommendations for priorities in endometriosis research. One major issue identified as impacting on the capacity to undertake endometriosis research is the need for multidisciplinary expertise. A total of 25 recommendations for research have been developed, grouped under 5 subheadings: (1) diagnosis, (2) classification and prognosis, (3) treatment and outcome, (4) epidemiology, and (5) pathophysiology. Endometriosis research is underfunded relative to other diseases with high health care burdens. This may be due to the practical difficulties of developing competitive research proposals on a complex and poorly understood disease, which affects only women. By producing this consensus international research priorities statement it is the hope of the workshop participants that researchers will be encouraged to develop new interdisciplinary research proposals that will attract increased funding support for work on endometriosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1933719108330568

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Diagram of schema used to group endometriosis research recommendations.
Figure 1. Diagram of schema used to group endometriosis research recommendations.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Activation of an inflammatory cascade within the peritoneal environment/endometriotic lesion can enhance the invasiveness of the lesion and contribute to pain.
Figure 2. Activation of an inflammatory cascade within the peritoneal environment/endometriotic lesion can enhance the invasiveness of the lesion and contribute to pain.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Pouly JL, et al. Endometrial dysfunction in endometriosis—Biochemical aspects. In: Rombauts L, Tsaltas J, Maher P, Healy D, eds. Endometriosis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2008:89–100. 2008 (10th World Congress on Endometriosis, Melbourne, Australia, 11–14 March 2008).
  2. Zondervan KT, Weeks DE, Colman R, et al. Familial aggregation of endometriosis in a large pedigree of rhesus macaques. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:448–455. · DOI · Paper page
  3. D’Hooghe TM, Kyama CK, Mihalyi AM, Chai D, Falconer H, Mwenda JM. The baboon model for translational research in endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2008; IN PRESS.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–342 of 342

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rogers, P. A. W., D’Hooghe, T. M., Fazleabas, A., Gargett, C. E., Giudice, L. C., Montgomery, G. W., Rombauts, L., Salamonsen, L. A., & Zondervan, K. T.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Peter A. W.
ORCID
Venue
Reproductive Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-04
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
335-346
ISSN
  • 1933-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-7205
DOI
10.1177/1933719108330568
PMC
PMC3682634
OpenAlex
W2166050085
Cited by
346
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
FWCI
24.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Reproductive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Wellcome Trust (085235)
  • Monash University
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (388901, 334063)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD055764)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
endometriosis, research priorities, research funding, infertility, pelvic pain, endometriosis diagnosis, endometriosis classification, prognosis, treatment outcomes, pathophysiology, multidisciplinary research, estrogen-dependent disease
MeSH terms
Animals, Consensus Development Conferences as Topic, Consensus Statements as Topic, Diagnostic Imaging, Disease Models, Animal, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Environment, Female, Health Priorities, Humans, Infertility, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Research, Research Support as Topic, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Pain, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review