Cited by 99Endometriosis Research and TreatmentVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryPlant and fungal interactions

Familial aggregation of endometriosis in a large pedigree of rhesus macaques

Zondervan, K. T.·2004·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis occurs in several non-human primate species that have menstrual cycles. This study investigated the prevalence and familial aggregation of endometriosis in one of those species, the rhesus macaque. METHODS: Between 1978 and 2001, 142 animals with endometriosis were identified from necropsy and surgical records and through the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, Madison, USA. All cases were used to build one large multigenerational pedigree and nine nuclear families comprising 1602 females in total. By 2002, the pedigrees contained 124 cases diagnosed at necropsy; 17 at surgery and three at MRI. Female animals that had died aged > or = 10 years without endometriosis, had both ovaries until at least 1 year prior to death, and had a full necropsy, were considered unaffected. RESULTS: The prevalence of endometriosis among necropsied animals aged > or = 10 years in the colony was 31.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26.9-35.9%]; prevalence increased with rising age and calendar age at death. Familial aggregation of endometriosis was strongly suggested by a significantly higher average kinship coefficient among affecteds compared with unaffecteds (P < 0.001) and a higher recurrence risk for full sibs (0.75; 95% CI 0.45-1.0) compared with maternal half sibs (0.26; 95% CI 0.10-0.41) and paternal half sibs (0.18; 95% CI 0.02-0.34). The segregation ratio among affected mothers (44.2%) was not significantly higher compared with unaffected mothers (36.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The results support familial aggregation of endometriosis in the rhesus macaque, and indicate that this is a promising animal model for the investigation of mode of inheritance, the location of potential genetic susceptibility loci and the influence of environmental factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/deh052

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zondervan, K. T.
Affiliations
Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
Corresponding author
Zondervan, K. T.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2004-02-01
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
448-455
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2168412098
Cited by
99
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 00167, P51RR000167)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and fungal interactions
Keywords
endometriosis, familial aggregation, rhesus monkeys, nonhuman primate model, endometriosis prevalence, recurrence risk, kinship coefficient, segregation ratio, mode of inheritance, genetic susceptibility loci, age at death
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Endometriosis, Female, Macaca mulatta, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Monkey Diseases, Pedigree, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review