The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press
Open accessAbstract
Despite signs of declining press trust in many western countries, we know little about trends in press trust across the world. Based on comparative survey data from the World Values Survey (WVS) and European Values Study (EVS), this study looks into national levels of trust in the press and identifies factors that drive differences across societies and individuals as well as over time. Findings indicate that the widely noted decline in media trust is not a universal trend; it is true for only about half of the studied countries, with the United States experiencing the largest and most dramatic drop in trust in the press. Political trust has emerged as key factor for our understanding of trust in the press. We found robust evidence for what we called the trust nexus —the idea that trust in the news media is strongly linked to the way publics look at political institutions. The link between press trust and political trust was considerably stronger in politically polarized societies. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that the relation between press trust and political trust is becoming stronger over time. We reason that the strong connection between media and political trust may be driven by a growing public sentiment against elite groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12152 · Cited by 2,452
Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation
Welzel, C. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139540919 · Cited by 1,294
Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230995 · Cited by 1,250
Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion
Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/590649 · Cited by 874
Cited by
Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120903408 · Cited by 978
“Trust in news is declining across the world (Hanitzsch et al., 2018) and trust in news on social media is now lower than in news accessed through other channels (Newman et al.”
BackgroundSocial Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Barberá, P. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.004 · Cited by 373
How Polarized Are Online and Offline News Audiences? A Comparative Analysis of Twelve Countries
Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161219892768 · Cited by 208
A Survey on the Detection and Impacts of Deepfakes in Visual, Audio, and Textual Formats
Mubarak, R., Alsboui, T., Alshaikh, O., Inuwa-Dutse, I., Khan, S., & Parkinson, S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3344653 · Cited by 132
Karlsen, R., & Aalberg, T. (2023) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1945938 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Press/Politics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-11-15
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-23
- ISSN
- 1040-1620 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1612
- 1940-1620
- OpenAlex
- W2763355592
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 56.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1940161217740695
- The paper
- Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.