Cited by 139Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Parity and risk of maternal cardiovascular disease: A dose–response meta-analysis of cohort studies

Li, Wenzhen, Ruan, Wenyu, Lu, Zuxun, Wang, Dongming·2019·European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Abstract

Background: Parity has been reported to play an important role in the development of cardiovascular disease; however, the results are still controversial. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of cohort studies to assess quantitatively the association between parity and cardiovascular disease risk. Methods: PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched to 1 June 2018, supplemented by manual searches of the bibliographies of retrieved articles. And multivariate-adjusted relative risks were pooled by using random-effects models. Restricted cubic spline analysis with four knots was used to explore the relationship of parity and the risk of cardiovascular disease. Results: Ten cohort studies involving 150,512 incident cases of cardiovascular disease among 3,089,929 participants were included in the meta-analysis. A significant association between parity and cardiovascular disease risk was observed while comparing parity with nulliparity, with a summarised relative risk of 1.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09–1.18; I 2 = 62.0%, P = 0.002). In the dose–response analysis, we observed a potential non-linear J-shaped dose–response relationship between the number of parity and cardiovascular disease risk, the summary risk estimates for an increase of one live birth was 1.04 (95% CI 1.02–1.05), with significant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 89.6%). In addition, the similar J-shaped associations between parturition number and cardiovascular disease, ischaemic heart disease or stroke risk were also observed. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ever parity is related to cardiovascular disease risk and there is an association between the number of pregnancies and the risk of cardiovascular disease. Since the number of included studies was limited, further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2047487318818265

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W., Ruan, W., Lu, Z., & Wang, D.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Xi'an Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Dongming
Venue
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2018-12-19
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
592-602
ISSN
  • 2047-4873 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-4881
OpenAlex
W2905347020
Cited by
139
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
parity, maternal cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, stroke, number of live births, nulliparity, J-shaped dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Maternal Health, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Parity, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Incidence, Risk Assessment, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review