Cited by 62Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Parity and Carotid Atherosclerosis in Men and Women: Insights Into the Roles of Childbearing and Child-Rearing

Open access
Skilton, Michael R., Sérusclat, André, Begg, Lisa M., Moulin, Philippe, Bonnet, Fabrice·2009·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Parity appears to be associated with carotid atherosclerosis in women aged 45 years and older. Studying this association among younger women and men may provide insight into whether this association relates predominantly to childbearing or child-rearing. Methods— The association between parity and carotid atherosclerosis (intima-media thickness and presence of plaques) was assessed in a cohort consisting of 750 women and 1164 men, all with at least one traditional cardiovascular risk factor, aged 18 to 80 years of age. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were also assessed, and the Framingham Risk Score calculated. Results— In age-adjusted analyses, the number of children was associated with adiposity, fasting glucose, 2-hour glucose, Framingham risk score, and carotid atherosclerosis in women, but not in men. Multivariate linear regression models indicate that the prevalence of plaques was increased by 15% (95% CI, 2 to 29) per child among women, and 0% (95% CI, −10 to 11) among men, after adjustment for age, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors (including waist circumference). The association between parity and carotid intima-media thickness was similar in younger and older women ( P Heterogeneity =0.20). Conclusions— A higher number of children is associated with increased carotid atherosclerosis in both younger and older women, but not among men. These findings indicate that childbearing, but not child-rearing, may be a risk factor for atherosclerosis, and suggest the potential importance of considering the number of children when assessing the level of cardiovascular risk in women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.108.535807

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, Graham I, Mancia G, Pyorala K. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommen- dations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. Atherosclerosis. 1998;140:199 -270.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skilton, M. R., Sérusclat, A., Begg, L. M., Moulin, P., & Bonnet, F.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • From the Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute (M.R.S.), Melbourne, Australia; the Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine Rhône-Alpes (CRNH-RA; M.R.S.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; the Hospices Civils de Lyon (A.S., P.M.), Fédération d’Endocrinologie, Hôpital Cardiovasculaire, Bron, France; the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (L.M.B.), Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; the INSERM (P.M.), U870, IFR62, Lyon, INRA, UMR1235, Lyon, INSA-Lyon, RMND,...
Venue
Stroke
Published
2009-04
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
1152-1157
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W1985674629
Cited by
62
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
parity, carotid atherosclerosis, carotid intima-media thickness, carotid plaque, childbearing, parenting, sex differences, cardiovascular risk, women, number of children, adiposity, fasting blood glucose
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carotid Arteries, Carotid Artery Diseases, Child, Child Rearing, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Parity, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Linear Models, Logistic Models, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review