Cited by 75Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryCancer survivorship and careVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

A feasibility study to determine the benefits of upper extremity virtual rehabilitation therapy for coping with chronic pain post-cancer surgery

Open access
House, Gregory, Burdea, Grigore, Grampurohit, Namrata, Polistico, Kevin, Roll, Doru, Damiani, Frank, Hundal, Jasdeep, Demesmin, Didier·2016·British Journal of Pain

Abstract

Background: Persistent pain in shoulder and arm following post-surgical breast cancer treatment can lead to cognitive and physical deficits. Depression is also common in breast cancer survivors. Virtual reality therapy with integrative cognitive and physical rehabilitation has not been clinically trialed for this population. The novel BrightArm Duo technology improved cognition and upper extremity (UE) function for other diagnoses and has great potential to benefit individuals coping with post-surgical breast cancer pain. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of BrightArm Duo therapy for coping with post-surgical chronic pain and associated disability in breast cancer survivors with depression. Methods: BrightArm Duo is a robotic rehabilitation table modulating gravity loading on supported forearms. It tracks arm position and grasping strength while patients play three-dimensional (3D) custom integrative rehabilitation games. Community-dwelling women (N = 6) with post-surgical breast cancer pain in the upper arm trained on the system twice a week for 8 weeks. Training difficulty increased progressively in game complexity, table tilt and session length (20–50 minutes). Standardized assessments were performed before and after therapy for pain, cognition, emotion, UE function and activities of daily living. Results: Subjects averaged upwards of 1300 arm repetitions and 850 hand grasps per session. Pain intensity showed a 20% downward trend (p = 0.1) that was corroborated by therapist observations and participant feedback. A total of 10 out of 11 cognitive metrics improved post-training (p = 0.01) with a significant 8.3-point reduction in depression severity (p = 0.04). A total of 17 of 18 range of motion metrics increased (p < 0.01), with five affected-side shoulder improvements above the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (8°). In all, 13 out of 15 strength and function metrics improved (p = 0.02) with lateral deltoid strength increasing 7.4 N on the affected side (p = 0.05). Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated feasibility of using the BrightArm Duo Rehabilitation System to treat cancer survivors coping with upper body chronic pain. Outcomes indicate improvement in cognition, shoulder range, strength, function and depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2049463716664370

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GET, exercises with a behavioural approach, CBT, Coping Strategies, Psychological Flexibility, and V.R. had positive effects on pain reduction compared to usual care, while Web-BCPA, EFT, matching therapy to psychological features, and physical cognitive-mindfulness did not affect reducing pain intensity.

    “GET, exercises with a behavioural approach, CBT, Coping Strategies, Psychological Flexibility, and V.R. had positive effects on pain reduction compared to usual care (Table 2) [18, 26, 27, 29, 30, 33]. Web-BCPA, EFT, matching therapy to psychological features, and physical cognitive-mindfulness did not affect reducing pain intensity.”

    From A Scoping Review of the Evidence regarding Assessment and Management of Psychological Features of Shoulder Pain. (2021) · cites this paper as [30]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [9]9. Just J, Mücke M, Bleckwenn M. Dependence on prescription opioids. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 2016; 113(13): 213–220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [26]26. Beck A, Steer R, Brown G. Manual for beck depression inventory, 2nd edn. Antonio, TX: Psychology Corp, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  3. [29]29. Benedict R. Brief visuospatial memory test: revised. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  4. [32]32. Barreca SR. Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory (CAHAI), 2015, http://www.cahai.ca/manual.html (accessed 26 October 2015). [PubMed]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
House, G., Burdea, G., Grampurohit, N., Polistico, K., Roll, D., Damiani, F., Hundal, J., & Demesmin, D.
Affiliations
  • Bright Cloud International (United States) (US)
  • Roosevelt Care Center, Edison, NJ, USA
  • Hundal Neuropsychology Group LLC, Watchung, NJ, USA
  • Somerset Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
House, Gregory
Venue
British Journal of Pain
Published
2016-09-16
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
186-197
ISSN
  • 2049-4637 (ISSN-L)
  • 2049-4645
OpenAlex
W2514036397
Cited by
75
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R43DA032224)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
virtual reality rehabilitation, upper limb rehabilitation, chronic pain, breast cancer survivors, depression, cognitive function, shoulder range of motion, arm muscle strength, rehabilitation robotics, feasibility, rehabilitation games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review