Cited by 135Cancer survivorship and careVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Virtual reality intervention for older women with breast cancer

Open access
Schneider, Susan M., Ellis, Mathew, Coombs, William T., Shonkwiler, Erin L., Folsom, Linda C.·2003·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

This study examined the effects of a virtual reality distraction intervention on chemotherapy-related symptom distress levels in 16 women aged 50 and older. A cross-over design was used to answer the following research questions: (1) Is virtual reality an effective distraction intervention for reducing chemotherapy-related symptom distress levels in older women with breast cancer? (2) Does virtual reality have a lasting effect? Chemotherapy treatments are intensive and difficult to endure. One way to cope with chemotherapy-related symptom distress is through the use of distraction. For this study, a head-mounted display (Sony PC Glasstron PLM - S700) was used to display encompassing images and block competing stimuli during chemotherapy infusions. The Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), Revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS), and the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) were used to measure symptom distress. For two matched chemotherapy treatments, one pre-test and two post-test measures were employed. Participants were randomly assigned to receive the VR distraction intervention during one chemotherapy treatment and received no distraction intervention (control condition) during an alternate chemotherapy treatment. Analysis using paired t-tests demonstrated a significant decrease in the SAI (p = 0.10) scores immediately following chemotherapy treatments when participants used VR. No significant changes were found in SDS or PFS values. There was a consistent trend toward improved symptoms on all measures 48 h following completion of chemotherapy. Evaluation of the intervention indicated that women thought the head mounted device was easy to use, they experienced no cybersickness, and 100% would use VR again.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/109493103322011605

Cites

36 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [11]Arthur C. Did reality move for you? New Scientist. 1992;134:22–27. [Google Scholar]
  2. [18]Schneider SM. Effect of virtual reality on symptom distress in breast cancer patients. Presented at the Virtual Reality and Mental Health Symposium, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality Conference; January 24–27; Newport Beach, CA. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. [19]Oshuga M, Tatsuno Y, Shimono F, et al. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 1998;1:10–112. [Google Scholar]
  4. [25]McNair DM, Lorr M, Doppleman LF. POMS: manual for Profile of Mood States. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service; 1971. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, S. M., Ellis, M., Coombs, W. T., Shonkwiler, E. L., & Folsom, L. C.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2003-06
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
301-307
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W2098128542
Cited by
135
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (1 P20 NR07795-01, P20NR007795)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
virtual reality, breast cancer, older women, chemotherapy, symptom distress, fatigue, anxiety, head-mounted displays, cybersickness, symptom management
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Cognition, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review