Cited by 56Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

Caught in the moment: Are there person-specific associations between momentary procrastination and passively measured smartphone use?

Open access
Aalbers, George, vanden Abeele, Mariek M. P., Hendrickson, Andrew T., de Marez, Lieven, Keijsers, Loes·2022·Mobile Media & Communication

Abstract

Procrastination is an increasingly prevalent phenomenon. Although research suggests smartphones might be involved, little is known about the momentary association between different patterns of smartphone use and procrastination. In a preregistered study, 221 students ( M age = 20, 55% female) self-reported procrastination five times a day for 30 days (i.e., experience sampling method) while their smartphone use was continuously monitored (i.e., passive logging). Using dynamic structural equation modeling on 27,151 observations, we estimated momentary within-person associations between procrastination and (a) total smartphone use and use of specific application categories (social media, messaging, browsers, games, and video streaming), (b) notifications, and (c) smartphone use fragmentation. Procrastination was positively albeit weakly associated with all aforementioned patterns, and associations varied from person to person. Collectively, our findings suggest these popular devices potentially encourage dilatory behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2050157921993896

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Push notifications often led to procrastination, especially when related to social media, games, and messages, delaying study tasks.

    “Aalbers et al. (2022) found that push notifications often led to procrastination, especially when related to social media, games, and messages, which were shown to delay study tasks.”

    From You have a notification: the role of push notifications in shaping students’ engagement, self-regulation and academic procrastination (2025) · cites this paper as Aalbers et al. (2022)

    The Discussion reports an association between notifications and procrastination, but says the observational data cannot establish that notifications caused it; procrastinatory messenger use could instead have generated more notifications. The paper discusses social media, games, and messaging as forms of smartphone use associated with procrastination, but does not show that notifications from those categories were especially likely to delay study tasks. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Push notifications planned through Moodle course content and tasks had a positive effect on reducing students' academic procrastination, contrary to Aalbers et al. (2022).

    “In this study, the push notifications, which were planned through Moodle course content and tasks, had a positive effect on reducing students' academic procrastination, contrary to the findings of Aalbers et al. (2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

13 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Davidson, B. I., Shaw, H., & Ellis, D. A. (2020). Fuzzy constructs in assessment: The overlap between mental health and technology 'use'. https://psyarxiv.com/6durk/
  2. Hendrickson, D., De Marez, L., Martens, M., Van Meer, M., Muller, G., Paisa, T., . . . Abeele, M. V. (2019). How do people use their smartphone? A data scientific approach to describe and identify user-related, system-related and context-related patterns in use. Paper presented at Annual Conference of the International Communication Association 2019: Communication Beyond Boundaries, Washington, United States.
  3. Klein, E. M., Beutel, M. E., Müller, K. W., Wölfling, K., Brähler, E., & Zenger, M. (2019). Assessing procrastination: Dimensionality and measurement invariance of the General Procrastination Scale-Screening (GPS-S) in a representative sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(5), 633-640. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000441 · DOI
  4. Lanette, S., Chua, P. K., Hayes, G., & Mazmanian, M. (2018). How much is 'too much'? The role of a smartphone addiction narrative in individuals' experience of use. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274370 · DOI
  5. Lavoie, J. A., & Pychyl, T. A. (2001). Cyberslacking and the procrastination superhighway: A web-based survey of online procrastination, attitudes, and emotion. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 431-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900403 · DOI
  6. Pychyl, T. A., Lee, J. M., Thibodeau, R., & Blunt, A. K. (2000). Five days of emotion: An experi- ence sampling study of undergraduate student procrastination. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(5), 239-254.
  7. vanden Abeele, M. V., Schouten, A. P., & Antheunis, M. L. (2017). Personal, editable, and always accessible: An affordance approach to the relationship between adolescents' mobile mes- saging behavior and their friendship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(6), 875-893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516660636 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aalbers, G., vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Hendrickson, A. T., de Marez, L., & Keijsers, L.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • Cognition and Communication, Tilburg University, Netherlands
  • imec-mict-UGent, Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Aalbers, George
Venue
Mobile Media & Communication
Published
2021-03-05
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
115-135
ISSN
  • 2050-1579 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-1587
OpenAlex
W3134160398
Cited by
56
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mobile Media & Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452-17-011)
  • Universiteit van Tilburg
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
procrastination, smartphone use, ecological momentary assessment, within-person associations, social media, messaging apps, video streaming, mobile gaming, notifications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review