Cited by 515Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingMental Health Research Topics

Using Smartphones to Collect Behavioral Data in Psychological Science: Opportunities, Practical Considerations, and Challenges

Open access
Harari, Gabriella M., Lane, Nicholas D., Wang, Rui, Crosier, Benjamin S., Campbell, Andrew T., Gosling, Samuel D.·2016·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Smartphones now offer the promise of collecting behavioral data unobtrusively, in situ, as it unfolds in the course of daily life. Data can be collected from the onboard sensors and other phone logs embedded in today’s off-the-shelf smartphone devices. These data permit fine-grained, continuous collection of people’s social interactions (e.g., speaking rates in conversation, size of social groups, calls, and text messages), daily activities (e.g., physical activity and sleep), and mobility patterns (e.g., frequency and duration of time spent at various locations). In this article, we have drawn on the lessons from the first wave of smartphone-sensing research to highlight areas of opportunity for psychological research, present practical considerations for designing smartphone studies, and discuss the ongoing methodological and ethical challenges associated with research in this domain. It is our hope that these practical guidelines will facilitate the use of smartphones as a behavioral observation tool in psychological science.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691616650285

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smartphones have allowed researchers to directly notify participants to fill out self-reports of their momentary experiences.

    “Smartphones have allowed researchers to directly notify participants to fill out self-reports of their momentary experiences (Harari et al., 2016; Wrzus & Mehl, 2015)”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Harari et al., 2016

  • An accurate understanding and assessment of emotion regulation should not be based only on self-report questionnaires but also on associated behavioral and physiological mechanisms provided by sensors and biosensors.

    “Ideally, an accurate understanding and assessment of ER should not be based only on self-report questionnaires but also on the associated behavioral and physiological mechanisms that could be provided by sensors (Harari et al., 2016) and biosensors (Figure 1; Marzano et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Campbell AT Lane ND 2013 7 Smartphone sensing: A game changer for behavioral science Workshop held at the Summer Institute for Social and Personality Psychology The University of California Davis
  2. Choudhury T Basu S 2004 Modeling conversational dynamics as a mixed-memory Markov process Saul LK Weiss Y Bottou L Advances in neural information processing systems 17 281 288 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
  3. Lee S Konrath S Himle J Bennett D 2015 3 Positive technology: Utilizing mobile devices for psychosocial intervention Conference at the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/umich.edu/positive-tech/home
  4. Mascolo C Rentfrow PJ 2011 Social sensing: Mobile sensing meets social science Workshop held University of Cambridge Cambridge, England

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harari, G. M., Lane, N. D., Wang, R., Crosier, B. S., Campbell, A. T., & Gosling, S. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Nokia (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Harari, Gabriella M.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2016-11
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
838-854
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2559181347
Cited by
515
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 2
FWCI
74.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30DA029926)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
smartphones, smartphone sensing, behavioral data collection, unobtrusive measurement, in situ data collection, onboard sensors, social interaction, physical activity, sleep, movement patterns, research design, research ethics
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Behavior, Humans, Psychology, Research Design, Computer Security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review