Cited by 27Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesInnovations in Medical Education

Investigating the challenges of clinical education from the viewpoint of nursing educators and students: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Hakim, Ashrafalsadat·2023·SAGE Open Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Nursing clinical education is an important part of education in nursing in which students obtain the necessary skills to care for patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the challenges of clinical education from the viewpoint of nursing educators and students. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the required information was collected in the form of a census from nursing educators and students. Based on the census method, the research samples consisted of 163 nursing educators and students. The data collection tool is a researcher-made questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an independent t-test. Results: The findings showed in the view of students the factors such as incongruity between educator’s expertise and internship, lack of qualified educators, student’s disinclination to study, lack of cooperation of health professionals, students’ unawareness of their strengths and weaknesses. Lack of skilled clinical educators in the educational planning section. Conclusion: According to the current challenges, identifying and then modifying clinical education challenges lead to achieving the educational goals and consequently, educating skillful personnel and supplying high-quality care services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20503121221143578

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]Webb M Kuntuova I Karabayeva A. The role of education in realising youths’ human capital: social philosophical analysis. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação 2018; 26(100): 968– 985.
  2. [12]Kermansaravi F Navidian A Imani M. Nursing students’ views toward quality of theoretical and clinical nursing education: a qualitative study. J Med Educ Dev 2013; 7(4): 28– 40.
  3. [13]Reynolds L Attenborough Halse J. Nurses as educators: creating teachable moments in practice. Nurs Times 2020; 116(2): 25– 28.
  4. [15]Hakim A Komeili SH Sohraby KM, et al. Analysis of nursing education challenges in the clinical field. Q Educ Dev Jundishapur 2016; 6(4): 277– 284.
  5. [17]Heydari K Ali-Sheykhi R Shahbazi S, et al. Nursing students’ viewpoints about problems of clinical education. J Health Care 2013; 13(1): 18– 23.
  6. [22]Dağ GS Kılıç HF Görgülü RS. Difficulties in clinical nursing education: views of nurse instructors’. Int Arch Nurs Health Care 2019; 5(1): 114.
  7. [23]Taghavi NS Arasteh H Abbassian H, et al. Faculty members’ background characteristics in clinical tutoring in nursing department: a qualitative study. Int J Health Stud 2020; 6(3): 5– 12.
  8. [29]Rajeswaran L. Clinical experiences of nursing students at a selected institute of health sciences in Botswana. Health Sci J 2016; 10(6): 1– 6.
  9. [30]Hakim A. Factors affecting satisfaction of nursing students of nursing major. J Nurs Educ 2013; 2(2): 10– 20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hakim, A.
Affiliations
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Hakim, Ashrafalsadat
Venue
SAGE Open Medicine
Published
2023-01
Volume
11
Pages
20503121221143578-20503121221143578
ISSN
2050-3121 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319443893
Cited by
27
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAGE Open Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
nursing faculty, nursing students, student motivation, interprofessional collaboration, educational planning, student self-awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review