Cited by 44Gastrointestinal motility and disordersInflammatory Bowel DiseaseAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Discriminant and convergent validity of the GSRS‐IBS symptom severity measure for irritable bowel syndrome: A population study

Open access
Ljótsson, Brjánn, Jones, Michael, Talley, Nicholas J, Kjellström, Lars, Agréus, Lars, Andreasson, Anna·2020·United European Gastroenterology Journal

Abstract

Background: The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale–Irritable Bowel Syndrome (GSRS‐IBS) is a 13‐item measure of IBS symptom severity. The scale has been used in several studies, but its psychometric properties have been insufficiently investigated and population‐based data are not available. Objective: The objective of this article is to establish the factor structure and discriminant and convergent validity of the GSRS‐IBS. Methods: The study was based on a Swedish population sample (the Popcol study), of which 1158 randomly selected participants provided data on the GSRS‐IBS. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and compared total and subscales scores in different groups, including IBS diagnostic status, treatment‐seeking behavior, and predominant bowel habits. The GSRS‐IBS scores were also correlated with quality of life indexes. Results: The sample included 164 participants with a confirmed Rome III IBS diagnosis and 994 participants without the disease. The CFA confirmed the subscales with one exception, in which the incomplete bowel‐emptying item belonged to the constipation subscale rather than the diarrhea subscale. The GSRS‐IBS total score and subscales were associated with diagnostic status, treatment‐seeking behavior, and quality of life dimensions. The relevant subscales scores also differed between the diarrhea‐ and constipation‐predominant subtypes of IBS. Conclusion: The GSRS‐IBS total score and subscales have high discriminant and convergent validity. The CFA confirmed the overall validity of the subscales but suggest that a sense of incomplete emptying belongs to the constipation rather than the diarrhea symptom cluster. We conclude that the GSRS‐IBS is an excellent measure of IBS symptom severity in the general population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2050640619900577

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ljótsson, B., Jones, M., Talley, N. J., Kjellström, L., Agréus, L., & Andreasson, A.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Stockholm Municipality (SE)
  • Department of Psychology Macquarie University North Ryde NSW Australia
Corresponding author
Ljótsson, Brjánn
Venue
United European Gastroenterology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
284-292
ISSN
  • 2050-6406 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-6414
OpenAlex
W3000385731
Cited by
44
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • United European Gastroenterology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, symptom severity assessment, psychometric validation, factor structure, discriminant validity, convergent validity, treatment-seeking behavior, bowel habits, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Constipation, Diarrhea, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Sweden, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review