The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heuristics of the algorithm: Big Data, user interpretation and institutional translation
Open accessAbstract
Intelligence on mass media audiences was founded on representative statistical samples, analysed by statisticians at the market departments of media corporations. The techniques for aggregating user data in the age of pervasive and ubiquitous personal media (e.g. laptops, smartphones, credit cards/swipe cards and radio-frequency identification) build on large aggregates of information (Big Data) analysed by algorithms that transform data into commodities. While the former technologies were built on socio-economic variables such as age, gender, ethnicity, education, media preferences (i.e. categories recognisable to media users and industry representatives alike), Big Data technologies register consumer choice, geographical position, web movement, and behavioural information in technologically complex ways that for most lay people are too abstract to appreciate the full consequences of. The data mined for pattern recognition privileges relational rather than demographic qualities. We argue that the agency of interpretation at the bottom of market decisions within media companies nevertheless introduces a ‘heuristics of the algorithm’, where the data inevitably becomes translated into social categories. In the paper we argue that although the promise of algorithmically generated data is often implemented in automated systems where human agency gets increasingly distanced from the data collected (it is our technological gadgets that are being surveyed, rather than us as social beings), one can observe a felt need among media users and among industry actors to ‘translate back’ the algorithmically produced relational statistics into ‘traditional’ social parameters. The tenacious social structures within the advertising industries work against the techno-economically driven tendencies within the Big Data economy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The amount and the diversity of consumer data favor their algorithmic processing (Bolin and Andersson Schwarz, 2015).”
From How online advertising targets consumers: The uses of categories and algorithmic tools by audience planners (2024) · cites this paper as Bolin and Andersson Schwarz, 2015
In the citing paper
“As less human agency is incorporated in their building, these categories lack explainability (Bolin and Andersson Schwarz, 2015); they have been coined”
From How online advertising targets consumers: The uses of categories and algorithmic tools by audience planners (2024) · cites this paper as Bolin and Andersson Schwarz, 2015
In the citing paper
“Several scholars have noted that algorithmically produced categories often need to be “translated back” into more classical narrative categories”
From How online advertising targets consumers: The uses of categories and algorithmic tools by audience planners (2024) · cites this paper as Bolin and Andersson Schwarz, 2015
In the citing paper
“In early academic works on big data technologies, these tools have been described as post-demographic machines (Rogers, 2009), operating a switch from a “Gaussian” to a “Paretian” world (Bolin and Andersson Schwarz, 2015).”
From How online advertising targets consumers: The uses of categories and algorithmic tools by audience planners (2024) · cites this paper as Bolin and Andersson Schwarz, 2015
Citations
Cites
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
D’Amico, R. (1978) · Telos · doi:10.3817/0678036169 · Cited by 19,439
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
Tarbet, D. W., Foucault, M., & Sheridan, A. (1978) · Eighteenth-Century Studies · doi:10.2307/2737970 · Cited by 19,271
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
Zukin, S., Foucault, M., & Sheridan, A. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2077073 · Cited by 15,381
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
Hacking, I. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819766 · Cited by 3,585
The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1430 · Cited by 3,483
The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2783 · Cited by 2,869
Linked: The New Science of Networks
Barabási, A.-Ĺ., & Aldana-Gonzalez, M. (2003) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.1570778 · Cited by 2,753
Gillespie, T. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809342738 · Cited by 2,522 · cited 3×
“In its search for outliers and ‘black swans’ (Taleb, 2007/2010) – that is, that which is beyond expectations – one could therefore say that government surveillance works in reverse compared to market surveillance.”
BackgroundHaggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1080/00071310020015280 · Cited by 2,244
Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology
Van Dijck, J. (2014) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776 · Cited by 2,203
For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign
Baudrillard, J., & Levin, C. D. (1980) · Cited by 2,111
The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & Their Consequences
Kitchin, R. (2014) · doi:10.4135/9781473909472 · Cited by 1,469 · cited 2×
“As Couldry (2014), Kitchin (2014) and Mosco (2014) have recently remarked, it is important to clarify whether what we are observing is an academic or a governmental turn to actually taking up Big Data as a heuristic – or if it is more a case of powerful institutions using the discourse or ‘myth’ of…”
BackgroundUnderstanding Social Media Logic
van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v1i1.70 · Cited by 1,438
Hacking, I. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817557 · Cited by 1,029
Hacking, I. (2002) · In the Scope of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0475-5_13 · Cited by 838
(1977) · Ctheory · Cited by 804
(1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 764
Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences
Chambers, T. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01572.x · Cited by 626
(2014) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 608
The digital person: technology and privacy in the information age
Solove, D. J. (2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5512 · Cited by 607
War in the Age of Intelligent Machines
Landa, M. D. (1991) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 604
Pickering, A. (2010) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226667928.001.0001 · Cited by 573
Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know
Andrejevic, M. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203075319 · Cited by 499
Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences
Napoli, P. M. (2010) · Cited by 457
Automated Media: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Algorithmic Media Production and Consumption
Napoli, P. M. (2014) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/comt.12039 · Cited by 405
Baudrillard, J., & Poster, M. (1973) · Cited by 396
Yolton, J. W. (1976) · Philosophical Books · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1976.tb01651.x · Cited by 368
The Thomas Theorem and The Matthew Effect
Merton, R. K. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/74.2.379 · Cited by 355
Infoglut: how too much information is changing the way we think and know
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-2140 · Cited by 355
Mager, A. (2011) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.676056 · Cited by 354
The Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect
Merton, R. K. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580486 · Cited by 319
Gates, K. A. (2016) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814732090.001.0001 · Cited by 280
The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future
(2011) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k.2011.06740aae.001 · Cited by 269
Deuze, M. (2011) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443710386518 · Cited by 247
3 For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign
Baudrillard, J. (2002) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781503619630-006 · Cited by 218
The mass audience: rediscovering the dominant model
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-4920 · Cited by 218
HOW LONG IS A TWEET? MAPPING DYNAMIC CONVERSATION NETWORKS ONTWITTERUSING GAWK AND GEPHI
Bruns, A. (2011) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2011.635214 · Cited by 214
To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World
(2015) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/0094306115579192c · Cited by 208
Watching as Working: the Valorization of Audience Consciousness
Jhally, S., & Livant, B. (1986) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01442.x · Cited by 202
Data not seen: The uses and shortcomings of social media metrics
Baym, N. K. (2013) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v18i10.4873 · Cited by 199
Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects
Ruppert, E. S. (2011) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038510394027 · Cited by 163
Small Worlds and the New ‘Social Physics’
Urry, J. (2004) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00083.x · Cited by 147
Audience manufacture in historical perspective: from broadcasting to Google
Bermejo, F. (2009) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444808099579 · Cited by 146
Boellstorff, T. (2013) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869 · Cited by 140
Dent, P. (2010) · Journal of Property Investment and Finance · doi:10.1108/jpif.2010.28.6.475.1 · Cited by 138
Exploitation comes home: a critique of the Marxian theory of family labour
Folbre, N. R. (1982) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035517 · Cited by 138
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203806432 · Cited by 128
Ratings and the institutional approach: A third answer to the commodity question
Meehan, E. R. (1984) · Critical Studies in Mass Communication · doi:10.1080/15295038409360032 · Cited by 114
What Do Metrics Want? How Quantification Prescribes Social Interaction on Facebook
Grosser, B. (2014) · Cited by 80
Value and the Media: Cultural Production and Consumption in Digital Markets
(2012) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/0094306112457771b · Cited by 74
Drones, Infrared Imagery, and Body Heat
Parks, L. (2014) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 57
Data Protection in a Profiled World
Gutwirth, S., Poullet, Y., & de Hert, P. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9 · Cited by 54
Predicting what you'll do tomorrow: Panspectric surveillance and the contemporary corporation
Palmås, K. (2010) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v8i3.4168 · Cited by 53
Online File Sharing: Innovations in Media Consumption
Schwarz, J. A. (2013) · Cited by 42
SYMBOLIC PRODUCTION AND VALUE IN MEDIA INDUSTRIES
Bolin, G. (2009) · Journal of Cultural Economy · doi:10.1080/17530350903345579 · Cited by 40
Self-citationBolin, G. (2012) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.677052 · Cited by 39
Self-citationGoggin, G., Martin, F. R., & Dwyer, T. (2015) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2014.890329 · Cited by 38
Gutwirth, S., & Hildebrandt, M. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_2 · Cited by 37
Prodnik, J. A. (2012) · tripleC Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society · doi:10.31269/triplec.v10i2.409 · Cited by 36
Transforming Audiences. Patterns of Individualization in Television Viewing
Bjur, J. (2009) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · Cited by 35
The Researcher and the Never-Ending Field: Reconsidering Big Data and Digital Ethnography
Lohmeier, C. (2014) · Studies in qualitative methodology · doi:10.1108/s1042-319220140000013005 · Cited by 33
How to do things with data: Meta–data, meta–media, and meta–communication
Jensen, K. B. (2013) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v18i10.4870 · Cited by 22
The Value of Being Public Service: the Shifting of Power Relations in Swedish Television Production
Bolin, G. (2004) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443704041178 · Cited by 17
Self-citationManaging in a Pareto world calls for new thinking
Andriani, P., & McKelvey, B. (2011) · M n gement · doi:10.3917/mana.142.0089 · Cited by 16
Schwarz, J. A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203744420 · Cited by 15
From Bell Curve to Power Law: Distributional Models between National and World Society
Hart, K. (2004) · Social Analysis · doi:10.3167/015597704782352285 · Cited by 12
Models of statistical distribution
Hart, K. (2010) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/1463499610365371 · Cited by 12
In the Market for Symbolic Commodities
Bolin, G. (2002) · Nordicom review/NORDICOM review · doi:10.1515/nor-2017-0329 · Cited by 9
Self-citationLocating the Social and Mobile: A Case Study of Women’s Use of Kakao Social Mobile Media in Seoul
Hjorth, L. (2014) · Asiascape Digital Asia · doi:10.1163/22142312-12340004 · Cited by 8
The concept of the network society : post-ontological reflections
Lehmann, N., Qvortrup, L., & Walther, B. K. (2007) · Cited by 7
The imagined user in projects: articulating competing discourses of space and knowledge work
Ivory, C. J., & Alderman, N. (2009) · Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) · doi:10.25405/ncl.34097088 · Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Andriani P, 2011, Management, 14, 89
- Bolin G, 2014, Mittfåra och marginal, 229
- Castells M (2000) The Rise of the Network Society , 2 ed. Cambridge, MA, & Oxford: Blackwell.
- Folbre N, 1982, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6, 317
- Ivory C, 2009, Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 9, 131
- Karlsson M, 2014, Dagensanalys.se
- Parks L, 2014, International Journal of Communication, 8, 2518
- Smythe D, 1977, Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 1, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732
Shin, D. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551 · Cited by 1,548
The social power of algorithms
Beer, D. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1216147 · Cited by 945
Shin, D. (2020) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2020.1843357 · Cited by 487
Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data
Dourish, P., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2018) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951718784083 · Cited by 220
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolin, G., & Andersson Schwarz, J.
- Affiliations
- Södertörn University (SE)
- Department of Media & Communication Studies, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden
- Corresponding author
- Bolin, Göran
- ORCID
- Bolin, Göran
- Venue
- Big Data & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-10-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2286657468
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 10.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
- Social Sciences › Communication › Technology's Impact on Media
- Keywords
- big data, media audiences, user interpretation, institutional translation, social categories, human agency, advertising industry, data commodification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review