Cited by 27Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Guidance on defining the scope and development of text-based coaching protocols for digital mental health interventions

Open access
Lattie, Emily G, Graham, Andrea K, Hadjistavropoulos, Heather D, Dear, Blake F, Titov, Nickolai, Mohr, David C·2019·DIGITAL HEALTH

Abstract

A body of literature suggests that the provision of human support improves both adherence to and clinical outcomes for digital mental health interventions. While multiple models of providing human support, or coaching, to support digital mental health interventions have been introduced, specific guidance on how to develop coaching protocols has been lacking. In this Education Piece, we provide guidance on developing coaching protocols for text-based communication in digital mental health interventions. Researchers and practitioners who are tasked with developing coaching protocols are prompted to consider the scope of coaching for the intervention, the selection and training of coaches, specific coaching techniques, how to structure communication with clients and how to monitor adherence to guidelines, and quality of coaching. Our goal is to advance thinking about the provision of human support in digital mental health interventions to inform stronger, more engaging, and effective intervention designs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2055207619896145

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in eCoaches' previous experiences are minimised by using message templates and by the possibility to discuss with senior researchers.

    “Further, the differences in previous experiences are minimised by using message templates and by the possibility to discuss with senior researchers (Lattie and Graham, 2019).”

    From Internet-based treatment for vulvodynia (EMBLA) – Study protocol for a randomised controlled study (2021) · cites this paper as Lattie and Graham, 2019

    The Coaching content section recommends message templates, and Coaching supervision and oversight recommends supervision and consultation with an experienced supervisor. The paper does not say these measures minimise differences in coaches’ previous experience; it instead says protocols and supervision should account for coaches’ backgrounds and training. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Schueller SM Tomasino KN Mohr DC. Integrating human support into behavioral intervention technologies: the efficiency model of support. Clin Psychol 2017; 24(1): 27– 45.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lattie, E. G., Graham, A. K., Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Dear, B. F., Titov, N., & Mohr, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Regina (CA)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lattie, Emily G
Venue
DIGITAL HEALTH
Published
2019-01
Volume
5
Pages
2055207619896145-2055207619896145
ISSN
2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995060633
Cited by
27
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Saskatchewn Ministry of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K08 MH112878, R01 MH100492)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (152917)
  • Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Sasktachewan Health Research Foundation
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01 DK116925)
  • Saskatchewan Centre for Patient-Oriented Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
digital mental health interventions, human support, coach education, coaching methods, intervention design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review