Cited by 17Digital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Becoming an eCoach: Training therapists in online cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain

Open access
Terpstra, Jessy A., van der Vaart, Rosalie, Spillekom-van Koulil, Saskia, van Dam, Arno, Rosmalen, Judith G.M., Knoop, Hans, van Middendorp, Henriët, Evers, Andrea W.M.·2018·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective Online cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) is effective in supporting patients' self-management. Since iCBT differs from face-to-face CBT on several levels, proper training of therapists is essential. This paper describes the development and evaluation of a therapist training based on theoretical domains that are known to influence implementation behavior, for an iCBT for chronic pain.Methods The training consists of 1.5 days and covers the implementation domains "knowledge", "skills", "motivation", and "organization", by focusing on the therapy's rationale, iCBT skills, and implementation strategies. Using an evaluation questionnaire, implementation determinants (therapist characteristics, e-health attitude, and implementation domains) and iCBT acceptance were assessed among participants after training.Results Twenty-two therapists participated, who generally showed positive e-health attitudes, positive implementation expectations, and high iCBT acceptance. Organizational aspects (e.g., policy regarding iCBT implementation) were rated neutrally.Conclusions An iCBT therapist training was developed and initial evaluations among participants showed favorable implementation intentions.Practice implications Therapists' positive training evaluations are promising regarding the dissemination of iCBT in daily practice. Organizational support is vital and needs to be attended to when selecting organizations for iCBT implementation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.029

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current evidence supports the feasible and efficacious delivery of web-based CBT using nontraditional health professionals such as PTs and OTs, with reduced time commitment and treatment costs, and positive self-reported changes in PTs' attitudes, confidence, and practice.

    “Current evidence supports the feasible and efficacious delivery of web-based CBT using nontraditional health professionals such as physiotherapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) [45], with reduced time commitment and treatment costs, and positive self-reported changes in the PTs’ attitudes, confidence, and practice [46-48].”

    From Development and usability testing of a web-based and therapist-assisted coping skills program for managing psychosocial problems in individuals with hand and upper limb injuries: Mixed methods study (2020) · cites this paper as [45]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Terpstra, J. A., van der Vaart, R., Spillekom-van Koulil, S., van Dam, A., Rosmalen, J. G. M., Knoop, H., van Middendorp, H., & Evers, A. W. M.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Terpstra, Jessy A.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
101
Issue
9
Pages
1702-1707
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795641583
Cited by
17
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars (2619)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, chronic pain, therapist training, implementation intentions, organizational support, pain self-management
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Telemedicine, Internet, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review