Cited by 18Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation

Effectiveness of biofeedback-assisted asynchronous telerehabilitation in musculoskeletal care: A systematic review

Open access
Janela, Dora, Costa, Fabíola, Weiss, Brandon, Areias, Anabela C., Molinos, Maria, Scheer, Justin K., Lains, Jorge, Bento, Virgílio +3 more·2023·DIGITAL HEALTH

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal conditions are the leading cause of disability worldwide. Telerehabilitation may be a viable option in the management of these conditions, facilitating access and patient adherence. Nevertheless, the impact of biofeedback-assisted asynchronous telerehabilitation remains unknown. Objective: To systematically review and assess the effectiveness of exercise-based asynchronous biofeedback-assisted telerehabilitation on pain and function in individuals with musculoskeletal conditions. Methods: This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was conducted using three databases: PubMed, Scopus, and PEDro. Study criteria included articles written in English and published from January 2017 to August 2022, reporting interventional trials evaluating exercise-based asynchronous telerehabilitation using biofeedback in adults with musculoskeletal disorders. The risks of bias and certainty of evidence were appraised using the Cochrane tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), respectively. The results are narratively summarized, and the effect sizes of the main outcomes were calculated. Results: Fourteen trials were included: 10 using motion tracker technology ( N = 1284) and four with camera-based biofeedback ( N = 467). Telerehabilitation with motion trackers yields at least similar improvements in pain and function in people with musculoskeletal conditions (effect sizes: 0.19–1.45; low certainty of evidence). Uncertain evidence exists for the effectiveness of camera-based telerehabilitation (effect sizes: 0.11–0.13; very low evidence). No study found superior results in a control group. Conclusions: Asynchronous telerehabilitation may be an option in the management of musculoskeletal conditions. Considering its potential for scalability and access democratization, additional high-quality research is needed to address long-term outcomes, comparativeness, and cost-effectiveness and identify treatment responders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20552076231176696

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital rehabilitation is effective among several musculoskeletal conditions regardless of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic backgrounds.

    “Previous research supports its effectiveness among several musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions [16-18] regardless of race/ethnicity [19] and socioeconomic backgrounds [20].”

    From Exploring the Importance of Race and Gender Concordance Between Patients and Physical Therapists in Digital Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Conditions: Observational, Longitudinal Study (2024) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Discussion (Comparison with literature; page unavailable) reports findings across diverse musculoskeletal conditions, including better pain outcomes for chronic knee and low-back pain and comparable outcomes in some post-surgical studies. But it says results varied by condition, and the Conclusions (page unavailable) say asynchronous telerehabilitation *may* be an option and call for more research. This supports the effectiveness portion associated with citations [16–18], though the unqualified wording is stronger than the review’s conclusion; race/ethnicity and socioeconomic background are assigned separate citations [19] and [20]. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Institute of Medicine Committee on Advancing Pain Research C and Education. The National Academies Collection: reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Relieving Pain in America: a Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janela, D., Costa, F., Weiss, B., Areias, A. C., Molinos, M., Scheer, J. K., Lains, J., Bento, V., Cohen, S. P., Correia, F. D., & Yanamadala, V.
Affiliations
  • Sword Health, Inc, Draper, UT, USA
  • Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Rovisco Pais Medical and Rehabilitation Centre, Tocha, Portugal
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Quinnipiac University (US)
Corresponding author
Yanamadala, Vijay
Venue
DIGITAL HEALTH
Published
2023-01
Volume
9
Pages
20552076231176696-20552076231176696
ISSN
2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380077365
Cited by
18
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Keywords
biofeedback, musculoskeletal disorders, exercise rehabilitation, pain, functional outcome, remote patient monitoring, access to rehabilitation services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review